Showing posts with label North African Campaign. Show all posts
Showing posts with label North African Campaign. Show all posts

Armor at Oran: Operation Torch, 1942

Tanks of the 2nd RCA in Oran, 1943. The French Renault D1 tanks fought against the American armored forces at Oran in late 1942.

by William R. Betson

The Oran landings were part of Operation Torch, the 1942 Anglo-American invasion of North Africa. Oran was selected because it is a major Mediterranean port and its nearby airfields were vital.

Algeria, then a colony of defeated France, was administered and defended by the Nazi-imposed Vichy French regime. The Germans permitted the Vichy government to maintain an army in North Africa for the external defense and internal security of their colonies there. Appreciating Oran's qualities as a potential air and logistical base, the French Army stationed some 16,000 men in the port and its environs and organized them into the Oran Division of eleven infantry, seven cavalry, and five artillery battalions. The division was at about 80-85 percent strength, but Axis restrictions on vehicles and spare parts kept it relatively immobile and denied it modern armored fighting vehicles. Although the Allies considered the division's colonial infantry as second rate, they believed that the French cadre of professional officers made the division more or less battle worthy. Further, the Allies counted the division's two Foreign Legion battalions among the best troops in the world.

French resolve was also in question. No one knew if the French would actually resist the landings and fight their old American allies but if they did, the Oran Division was not to be considered an insignificant force.

Several French warships and forty-five fortified coastal defense guns raised even greater concern about an Oran landing. There were also six more guns at nearby Arzew, a potential landing site. In addition to ground troops and warships, there were about one hundred French warplanes, including modern fighters, at the airfields of La Senia and Tafaraoui. This air force was estimated to be capable of wresting local air superiority from the British carrier-based naval aircraft that would support the operation. Should the Allied force fail to quickly neutralize the French aviation, the establishment of an amphibious force ashore would prove impossible.

In addition to the threat posed by the enemy air, land and sea forces, Allied shipping assets were questionable. Until almost the last minute, no one knew how many ships would be available and at that time, there were no specialized tank landing ships (LSTs) available to put armored forces ashore. The British did provide three makeshift landing ships—converted from the shallow draft oil tankers used on Venezuela's Lake Maracaibo—but because of height restrictions, these could carry only light tanks and half-tracks; American medium tanks were too tall. Until a port was seized, armored support for the operation would be limited to the sixty M3 light tanks and sixty half-tracks which could be crammed aboard these converted ships.

In addition, the following factors were also considered to be a source of potential trouble for the Allied forces landing at Oran:

An amphibious landing had to be carried out at some distance from the port against a well-defended area.

Unless the landing force seized the local airfields quickly, the French could gain air superiority and doom the operation.

Unless the operation succeeded quickly, the French would have time to demolish the port and render the entire operation pointless.

Finally, the swift movement from the relatively distant beaches to the port and airfields would be difficult since only enough armored vehicles to equip one light tank and one mechanized infantry battalion could be quickly put ashore.

The Allies were unsure whether the Vichy French would fight. But the planners of the operation had to assume resistance would be fierce. Facing a risky undertaking, their bold use of the available armor bears our close analysis.

The Allied plan was conceived at Headquarters, Center Task Force (CTF), commanded by Lt. Gen. Lloyd R. Fredendall. The force was comprised of the 1st U.S. Infantry Division, CCB of the U.S. 1st Armored Division, an airborne battalion, elements of the U.S. 1st Engineer Special Brigade, and assorted support troops. Fredendall's staff consisted basically of the staff of the U.S. II Corps, which he also commanded.

The concept of operations was imaginative and daring. The operation would begin with a parachute assault on the main French airfield at Tafaraoui, followed by amphibious landings at three separate points on the coast. Small armored units put ashore from the makeshift LSTs would attempt to link up with the airborne force. Then all forces would converge on the port. While this was underway, an infantry battalion on board two ex-U.S. Coast Guard cutters would attempt to sail into the port, rush the docks and seize them by force. Additionally, as soon as the airfields were seized, word would be flashed to Gibraltar where the Spitfires of the 31st U.S. Fighter Group would be waiting to fly to Oran. If all went according to plan, fighters would be flown to the seized airfield and be operational by D-Day afternoon. Air superiority, a major prerequisite for success, would be assured.

Speed was essential, for the objective was to overwhelm the French before they could make up their minds to resist. No overwhelming predominance of force was being employed—the number of maneuver battalions in CTF was about equal to the number in the Oran Division—and the latter could be heavily reinforced within a few days by other French units in North Africa. The plan depended on lightning maneuver to paralyze the enemy. Since speed was such a prerequisite for success, the armored forces had an importance much beyond their numbers.

The armored combat command was divided into two task forces which would land on either flank of the assault. The first, Task Force Red, under the command of Brig. Gen. Lunsford E. Oliver, would land some 20 miles east of Oran at Beach "Z," near Arzew. Under the "Z Force" plan, two regimental combat teams of the 1st Infantry Division (16 and 18) would land and secure a foothold southeast of Arzew, while the 1st Ranger Battalion would take out a pair of coastal defense batteries north of the town. As soon as possible after the landing, TF Red would pass a flying column through the secured beachhead to race the 25 miles to the Tafaraoui airfield via Ste. Barbe-du-Tielot. The makeup of the flying column was determined by the number of vehicles that could be jammed into the two converted landing ships.

The other half of CCB, 1st Armored Division—Task Force Green under Col. Paul Robinett—would accomplish the right flank landing of the operation at "X" Beach, some 30 miles west of Oran near Mersa Bou Zedjar. TF Green's plan was similar to that at "Z" Beach. Two dismounted companies of the 6th Armored Infantry Regiment would seize a beachhead through which a flying column would pass. The only difference was that this column would move inland to Lourmel where it would receive orders from CCB to either move north of a salt marsh southwest of Oran to seize La Senia airfield, or go south of the marsh to help with the capture of Tafaraoui. As with TF Red, the size of the flying column was determined by the number of vehicles which could fit into the single landing craft allotted "X" Force.

The main bodies of the two task forces would move along the routes cleared by the flying columns as soon as the former could get ashore and organized. This would take time as the armored vehicles not delivered to the shore would have to be transported from a cargo ship to a landing craft and landed one or two at a time. In the case of the M3 medium tanks of the 2nd Battalion, 13th Armored Regiment, the docks at Arzew were required. The success of the operation then, depended on the skill and élan of the flying columns. In the final analysis, the success of the Oran landings and of Operation Torch depended on three light tank companies.

Two disasters quickly jeopardized the operation and made its success even more dependent on the 1st Armored's tankers. The airborne operation, under Lt. Col. Edson Raff, never really got started because the transport planes carrying the unit from Britain got lost. Although most of the inexperienced pilots managed to get their paratroopers to the vicinity of Oran, the 2nd Battalion, 509th Parachute Infantry, never got to the airfield until after the operation. Even then, Raff could assemble only 300 of his 556 troops.

The other disaster resulted from the attempted coup de main on the docks at Oran. The plan, Operation Reservist, called for the 1st Armored Division's 3rd Battalion, 6th Armored Infantry, to sail straight into Oran harbor aboard British-manned ex-U.S. Coast Guard cutters, dock at the wharves and seize the port facilities. CTF opposed this seemingly reckless idea, but the British pressed for its approval. The cutters approached the harbor with large American flags flying and loudspeakers announcing both the American nature of the operation and its friendly intentions, but once the two small warships broke into the harbor, they were promptly blown out of the water by French gunners firing at point-blank range. Operation Reservist remains one of the war's most complete disasters. Only forty-seven uninjured soldiers got ashore and were immediately captured.

If the armored columns met similar fates, the operation would fail.

The main landings took place uneventfully just east of Arzew at 0100 hours. The thirty-four transports of "Z" Force began to put ashore two-thirds of the 1st Infantry Division, the 1st Ranger Battalion, and the armored Task Force Red. The Rangers quickly seized the Arzew coastal batteries and the infantry secured the beaches against minimal opposition. But disembarking the tanks posed problems and took longer than planned. This delayed the operation, but by about 0820, the reconnaissance force under Capt. Samuel Yeiter, moved out from the beach, followed fifteen minutes later by the rest of the flying column commanded by Lt. Col. John K. Waters. Waters' flying column moved toward Tafaraoui airfield, covering the 25 miles to the field without opposition. At Tafaraoui, fire from French dual-purpose anti-aircraft guns halted Waters' advance. Waters directed his attached tank destroyer platoon to engage the French guns while he detached two infantry platoons to go beyond the airfield and cut the road to Oran, blocking the approach of reinforcements. Simultaneously, A Co., 1st Armored Regiment, attacked the airfield from the south while B Co., and 1st Platoon, E Co., 6th Infantry, struck from the east. Shocked by finding their inland airfield under attack by American armor, the French surrendered, quickly yielding some three hundred prisoners.

At 1215 hours, word reached Gibraltar that Tafaraoui airfield was captured and by 1630 the Spitfires of the 308th and 309th Fighter Squadrons, 31st Fighter Group, USAAF, arrived. In one bold stroke, French airpower in northwestern Algeria had been dealt a crippling blow, American air superiority was assured and the major communications route from Oran to the interior had been cut.

CCB's other element, TF Green, had a more difficult time. Although the initial echelons met no resistance, the transport landing Lt. Col. John H. Todd's flying column grounded 360 feet offshore. It took until 0815 to ferry the column's twenty-seven half-tracks, sixteen jeeps and twenty light tanks to the beach.

Once ashore, Todd's reconnaissance force departed for Lourmel where it clashed briefly with a French armored car of the 2nd Chasseurs d'Afrique. Soon, the rest of the force was rolling and by 1135 was in Lourmel. Todd had been in Lourmel for about thirty minutes when the TF commander directed him to take the northern route to the La Senia airfield because TF Red needed no help at Tafaraoui. Leaving one tank platoon to outpost Lourmel, he set off with a much depleted force of fifteen tanks and several half-tracks.

Communications problems then began to plague TF Green. Units moving to Lourmel lost contact with the beach because of the intervening high ground. The flying column lost contact with the task force and Robinett had no idea of his subordinate's position or situation until the next day when the main body of TF Green closed on La Senia. As Todd maneuvered to overcome resistance from French armored cars at Bou Tlelis, he lost contact with his assault gun section and a tank platoon. These losses, plus two tanks damaged by enemy fire, further reduced Todd's force to seven light tanks and a few half-tracks—out of the force of forty-seven armored vehicles that had left "X" Beach. Deep in the rear of a 16,000-man enemy division, he pushed on with his puny force and destroyed a 75-mm gun position at Bredea Station. After meeting more resistance near Misserrhin, he halted for the night.

Robinett followed Todd, collecting his stragglers. Headquarters picked up Todd's detached platoon at Lourmel and collected Todd's other elements near Bou Tlelis. With most of the flying column now under his direct command, Robinett spent the night between Bou Tlelis and Bredea Station. Thus, at the end of D-Day, TF Green lay scattered between Mersa Bou Zedjar on the coast at "X" Beach, and Misserrhin, its precarious position aggravated by communications difficulties. Had the French counterattacked, they could have defeated Robinett's command in detail.

But despite all these problems, plus the failures of the airborne landings and the harbor assault, CTF had securely established all three beachheads and captured the critical airfield at Tafaraoui. Some 14,000 troops were ashore and progressing toward their objectives. At "Y" Beach, the 26th Regimental Combat Team had made good progress and was in contact with the French 2nd Zouaves Regiment on the Djebel (Mountain) Murjadjo. The 18th and 16th RCTs had pushed well inland, meeting serious resistance only at St. Cloud where the 1st Battalion of the 1st Foreign Legion Regiment and the 16th Tunisian Tirailleurs were well entrenched. At sea, the Allied naval escort had easily repulsed several forays by French naval units and destroyed or neutralized the coastal artillery positions.

On the other hand, the operation was not yet out of the woods. Units of CCB were deep within enemy territory, and difficult or impossible to support should they get in trouble. The French had resisted much more firmly than expected; the Zouaves on the Djebel and, especially, the Legionnaires at St. Cloud, had fought spiritedly and skillfully. In fact, CTF at first decided that St. Cloud, astride the main supply route from "Z" Beach to Oran, would have to be taken before the final assault on Oran could begin.

The French high command realized, of course, that its relatively numerous dispersed forces could be defeated in detail. So, they concentrated their available mobile formations into two light mechanized brigades for use as rapid reaction forces. But their obsolescent Renault R-35s were no match for even the M3 light tanks.

The French command had positioned one of these brigades south of Oran, near Sidi-bel-Abbes (home of the Foreign Legion) and, upon hearing of the American landings, they ordered this force to attack northward, recapture Tafaraoui, and breakthrough to Oran.

In contrast to the French command's sluggish reactions, the Americans now demonstrated their flexibility. Expecting an attack from Sidi-bel-Abbes, they used air patrols to reconnoiter the roads north of that town. The French move was observed and the American command reacted quickly. CTF sent dive bombers to attack the column and rushed a platoon each of light tanks and tank destroyers, plus the only two debarked medium tanks of the 2nd Battalion, 13th Armored Regiment, forward from the docks at Arzew. In addition, Fredendall held most of TF Red at the Tafaraoui airfield instead of moving it north to attack Valmy. This last move was decisive.

The Americans were ready when the French brigade made contact with the reconnaissance platoon of the 1st Battalion, 1st Armored Regiment, on the afternoon of 9 November 1942, near Ste. Barbe-du-Tielot. This would be the U.S. Army's first North African tank-versus-tank action and it ended quickly with victory for the Americans.

While Lt. Robert Whitsit's platoon of the 701st Tank Destroyer Battalion laid down a fire base, Capt. William Tuck's B Co., 1st Armored Regiment, attacked the French in an inverted wedge formation. The old, slow Renaults were no match for the U.S. tanks and the qualitative difference was decisive. Tuck's tankers knocked out fourteen French tanks in rapid succession. The commander of the 1st Battalion, 1st Armored Regiment, described the action as more of a tragic massacre than a battle. The French light mechanized brigade retreated and did not again threaten the landings. The Americans lost one tank, one half-track, and one man.

Another French effort caused the American commanders more worry. Near La Macta, on the far eastern flank of the U.S. landings, elements of the 2nd Algerian Tirailleurs infiltrated the positions of the 1st Battalion, 16th U.S. Infantry, and temporarily cut off the Americans. However, by the time relief armored units reached the area, the 16th Infantry had restored the situation.

The failure of the counterattacks meant that the French could not reinforce Oran before the Americans could conduct a coordinated attack. The city's defense would lay in the hands of its approximately five infantry battalions and one cavalry regiment, a force decidedly inferior to the thirteen-plus better-equipped U.S. battalions now ashore. But all was not yet lost for the French. Their force had not yet suffered severe casualties, and they could concentrate their still-fresh infantry battalions in an arc of relatively strong positions south of the cities of St. Cloud Arcole, Valmy, La Senia, Misserrhin and the Djebel Murdjadjo.

As daylight broke on the 9th, Todd's greatly depleted flying column on the other side of Oran resumed its march toward the La Senia airfield. Bypassing Misserrhin, Todd thrust his small force between the French positions at Valmy and La Senia, surprising and overrunning the airfield, capturing a few planes, some 75-mm artillery pieces, and a considerable number of prisoners. He then deployed his puny force, now surrounded on three sides by superior French forces, and on the fourth by an impossible marsh. Although the French directed artillery fire onto the airfield, for some reason they never attacked this weak and exposed force. Todd hung on and was joined that afternoon by a tank company and mechanized platoon which Oliver had detached from TF Red and sent to the airfield. This reinforcement enabled Todd to conduct a spoiling attack that silenced the most troublesome French artillery battery.

Meanwhile, Robinett, with elements of both the flying column and the main body, moved out at dawn from his position near Bredea. His force made rapid progress until it reached the French outpost at Misserrhin where he took artillery fire. Replying with his self-propelled guns of the 27th Artillery, Robinett ordered an attack on the town. But having no infantry (it was left back at Er Rahel), he could either wait until infantry could be brought up from Mersa Bou Zedjar, or take his command around Misserrhin through the only route left to him, the supposedly impassable Sebkra marsh. Robinett still had no communications with Todd, but knew that the remnants of the flying column were weak and might be destroyed by a French counterattack.

Robinett decided to attempt to bypass by moving through the marsh. In the dying light, Robinett's force immediately set out. Slowly, and with many halts to recover mired vehicles, the force struggled through the lake bed. The mud seemed like wet cement, and Robinett began to despair of getting through. Finally, at about midnight, Robinett drove on ahead of his column in a jeep to attempt to make contact with Todd, who had traversed the marsh during daylight. Robinett found a guide that Todd had posted, and closed on Todd at about 0400—and none too soon. Todd's force was out of fuel and running out of ammunition. Robinett's arrival coupled with that of Lt. Col. William Kern and half of the 1st Battalion, 6th Infantry Regiment at daybreak, assured the position at La Senia airfield.

While CCB was securing La Senia airfield and defeating the French counterattacks, the main elements of the 1st Infantry Division continued to close on Oran.

The 18th Infantry attempted a coordinated attack on St. Cloud, east of the city, on the 9th, but French troops, especially the Legionnaires, put up fierce resistance, and the attack bogged down by noon with considerable casualties. Wanting to keep moving toward Oran and desiring to avoid heavy civilian casualties, the commanding general of the 1st Infantry Division, Maj. Gen. Terry Allen, ordered that St. Cloud be invested by one battalion and that the remainder of the regiment move toward Oran in preparation for the general assault on the city to be carried out the next morning.

As night fell on 9 November, CTF could again be satisfied. The 18th and 16th Infantry Regiments were closing on Oran from the east. Both major airfields had been taken and the main French counterattacks defeated. Both CCB and 1st Infantry Division were in good positions to conduct a concentric attack on Oran the next day. Fredendall dispatched his G-3, Col. Claude B. Ferenbaugh, ashore to headquarters, 1st Inf. Div., to coordinate the move. Meeting with Allen and Oliver, Ferenbaugh directed that all units jump off at 0730 on the 10th. Speed was essential, as no one wanted to give the French another day to wreck the harbor.

None of the American units made their line of departure (LD) by 0730. Exhausted after two weeks confinement aboard ship and three days fighting with little sleep, the infantry could not reach their start lines on time. Once the 16th and 18th Regiments did get going, they met spirited resistance from the 2nd Zouaves near Arcole and St. Eugene and were delayed.

CCB planned to make its main attack with the elements of TF Green at La Senia airfield. Robinett, however, did not receive orders for the attack until a few hours before LD time, just as he was preparing to attack the enemy around Valmy. Robinett refused to make this new attack before he was ready and asked Oliver if he could delay his LD time and "be allowed to get it off just as quickly as possible." The commanding general of CCB concurred, but stressed the need for speed.

Robinett concentrated the bulk of his force—two and one-half tank companies, one company of armored infantry, and a section of tank destroyers, under Lt. Col. Todd and ordered him to bypass the enemy near La Senia and drive straight for the port and for the French headquarters in town.

Todd jumped off in massed formation at about 0930 and traversed the open ground west of La Senia opposed only by sporadic artillery fire (which may have been misdirected British naval gunfire). While Todd moved west of town, TF Red detached Lt. Col. Waters east of the village in a supporting attack along a parallel route.

Once Todd and Waters had bypassed La Senia, Robinett ordered his headquarters tank platoon to attack the town. French resistance suddenly collapsed when tanks penetrated their defensive belt. Over 1,000 Frenchmen surrendered to the tank platoon. This behavior was in stark contrast to that exhibited at St. Cloud where the French had fought against a standard infantry/artillery attack.

Todd and Waters now had little in front of them. Eliminating a roadblock on the outskirts of town, CCB encountered only scattered sniper fire, and small arms and vehicular machine gun fire effectively dealt with that. As Lt. Col. Todd observed, ."50-caliber machine guns are excellent against snipers. They will shoot right through a house." By 1100, Todd's forces had reached the port and French military headquarters and captured the French commanding general. With this, the battle was over and the remaining French forces surrendered, although St. Cloud resisted one more attack. That afternoon, CCB moved to the vicinity of Tafaraoui to rest, reorganize, and prepare for further action against the Germans in Tunisia.

The American victory at Oran is not a well-known feat of arms. Neither France nor the U.S. really wanted to publicize a battle fought between old allies. CTF suffered over six hundred casualties, including 276 killed. But these losses, considering the importance of the objective, were acceptable, and the Oran operation must be considered a significant victory.

The Allies had moved over 27,000 men a great distance on relatively short notice and had seized two important airfields and a port in minimal time against considerable resistance. All arms contributed to the victory.

In examining these implications, we may first note the use of the limited armor available (it was never more than five light companies) as a maneuver force. The Allied command had two reasons for initially concentrating its armor and not dispersing it among the infantry. First, the Americans had to quickly seize the Tafaraoui airfield. Secondly, because many enemy coastal defenses precluded a landing nearer the objective, the attackers had to complete a fast overland movement to prevent Oran from being significantly reinforced.

But even on the third day when the opportunity presented itself for the use of armor to support a traditional combined arms assault on the city, Fredendall kept his available armor concentrated and used it to pierce a hole through the enemy defense rather than to crush it.

Obviously, there are tactical situations where it might be necessary to parcel out armor to support infantry. The infantry could have used some tanks in the assault on St. Cloud, but St. Cloud was not the objective. If available armor is limited, one must mass it at the decisive point.

If concentration of armor appears to be one lesson of Oran, redundancy in planning seems to be another. CTF did not rely on one strike force to eliminate the main threat to the success of the operation—French airpower. Three separate elements, TF Red, TF Green, and the airborne battalions, received the mission of securing Tafaraoui airfield. Should one or even two of the forces have been delayed or destroyed, another could have accomplished the mission.

Finally, when one studies the Oran experience of 1942, one is struck by the boldness of the planners' concept of operations. Landing at widely separated points and sending small armored flying columns deep into a numerically superior enemy rear is not a cautious operational maneuver. But, I believe, boldness was desirable. Indeed, in the uncertain political situation that existed in 1942 at Oran, boldness was required. Lightning movement seems to have paralyzed the uncertain French and caused the main prizes—the port and airfields, to fall almost without a fight.

The ill-fated Operation Reservist, however, demonstrates that planners must not cross the border between boldness and recklessness. The plan for the 3rd Battalion, 6th Infantry's coup de main appears so ridiculous in hindsight that it would be almost comical, were it not so tragic. If the Oran operation as a whole seems to bolster the arguments of those who favor the maneuver over the firepower/attrition approach to tactics, the Reservist episode should remind us that sometimes bold movement and élan are not enough.

Maneuver, and not firepower, seems, nevertheless, to have been the key to victory at Oran. Tafaraoui airfield was captured when American amphibious forces landed at distance from the main enemy forces and struck rapidly with light armor into the enemy's rear. The Americans took the indirect approach. They did not attempt to use the firepower of the battleship to suppress coastal fortifications and attempt a frontal assault.

Similarly, at La Senia, TF Green bypassed Misserrhin and struck between the enemy positions at Valmy and La Senia to seize a lightly defended airfield. Finally, on 10 November, CCB bypassed enemy positions leaving a strong force astride their communications at Valmy and La Senia, and struck directly toward the port and French headquarters where French forces had been drawn in a linear-type defense with strongpoints south of the city.

At Oran, boldness and maneuver worked together against an irresolute and quickly dispirited enemy. Had the vital objective been St. Cloud, defended by the Foreign Legion, rather than the Oran docks, success would have required a traditional combined arms assault. Similarly, the deep strike maneuver conducted by light forces to seize Tafaraoui would have failed had the armored counterattack been made by a battalion of German PzKpfw. IVs or even French Char B1s, rather than the pitiful Renaults. That fight was decided by weight of armor and caliber of gun, not maneuver. Maneuver can enhance firepower, but it cannot replace it. Oran tells us that, too.

Landing M7 Gun Motor Carriage of the 1st Armored Division at Oran, Algeria, part of Operation Torch, the Anglo-American invasion of North Africa. 9 November 1942.

X White Beach on the Bay of Mersa Bou Zedjar. Note barriers to exit from beach.

Y Beaches, Les Andalouses.

Y White Beach, Les Andalouses. Landing craft at left is an LCM.

Troops and equipment coming ashore, Z White Beach near St. Leu.

The Maracaibo H.M.S. Misoa, a converted shallow-draft oiler used as a tank landing ship. At Z Red Beach, light tanks were discharged through doors in the bow over bridge sections to the shore.

French prisoners captured by men of Combat Command B, 1st Armored Division, are guarded by MP's on the beach near St. Leu, 8 November 1942.  

Maj. Gen. Lloyd R. Fredendall, center, U.S. Commander of the Center Task Force. From left, officers are Brig. Gen. Lunsford E. Oliver, Brig. Gen. Lowell Rooks, General Fredendall, Lt. Gen. Mark W. Clark, and Brig. Gen. James H. Doolittle. (Photograph taken December 1942.)

Seizure of Oran, 8-10 November 1942.

 

M3 Lee/Grant: American Medium Tank

Medium Tank M3, Fort Knox, June 1942.

The Medium Tank M3 was an American tank used during World War II. In Britain the tank was called by two names based on the turret configuration. Tanks employing US pattern turrets were called the "Lee," named after Confederate General Robert E. Lee. Variants using British pattern turrets were known as "Grant," named after U.S. General Ulysses S. Grant.

Design commenced in July 1940 and the first M3s were operational in late 1941. The U.S. Army needed a good tank and coupled with the United Kingdom's demand for 3,650 medium tanks immediately, the Lee began production by late 1940. The design was a compromise meant to produce a tank as soon as possible. The M3 had considerable firepower as it was well armed and provided good protection, but had certain serious drawbacks in its general design and shape, such as: a high silhouette, an archaic sponson mounting of the main gun, riveted construction, and poor off-road performance. Its overall performance was not satisfactory and the tank was withdrawn from front line duty — except in the remote areas of the Asian Theater where it was used by British forces as late as mid-1944 or later — as soon as the M4 Sherman became available in large numbers. In spite of this it was considered by Hans von Luck superior to the best German tank at the time of its introduction, the Panzer IV.

In 1939, the U.S. Army possessed approximately 400 tanks, mostly M2 Light Tanks, with 18 of the to-be-discontinued M2 Medium Tanks as the only ones considered "modern." The U.S. funded tank development poorly during the interwar years, and had no infrastructure for production, little experience in design, and poor doctrine to guide design efforts.

The M2 medium tank was typical of armored fighting vehicles (AFVs) many nations produced in 1939. When the U.S. entered the war, the M2 design was already obsolete with a 37 mm gun, 32 mm frontal armor, excessive machine gun secondary armament and a very high silhouette. The Panzer III and Panzer IV's success in the French campaign led the U.S. Army to order immediately a new medium tank armed with a 75 mm gun in a turret. This would be the M4 Sherman. Until the Sherman reached production, an interim design with a 75 mm gun was urgently needed.

The M3 was the solution. The design was unusual because the main weapon — a larger caliber, low-velocity 75 mm gun — was in an offset sponson mounted in the hull with limited traverse. (The sponson mount was necessary because at the time American tank plants were incapable of casting a turret big enough to hold the 75mm main gun). A small turret with a lighter, high-velocity 37 mm gun sat on the tall hull. A small cupola on top of the turret held a machine gun. The use of two main guns was seen on the French Char B, the Soviet T-35, and the Mark I version of the British Churchill tank. In each case, two weapons were mounted to give the tanks adequate capability in firing both anti-personnel high explosive ammunition and armor-piercing ammunition for anti-tank combat. The M3 differed slightly from this pattern having a main gun which could fire an armor-piercing projectile at a velocity high enough for efficiently piercing armor, as well as deliver a high-explosive shell that was large enough to be effective. Using a hull mounted gun, the M3 design could be produced faster than a tank featuring a turreted gun. It was understood that the M3 design was flawed, but Britain urgently needed tanks.

The M3 was tall and roomy: the power transmission ran through the crew compartment under the turret cage to the gearbox driving the front sprockets. Steering was by differential braking, with a turning circle of 37 ft (11 m). The vertical volute-sprung suspension (VVSS) units possessed a return roller mounted directly atop the main housing of each of the six suspension units (three per side), designed as self-contained and readily replaced modular units bolted to the hull sides. The turret was power-traversed by an electro-hydraulic system in the form of an electric motor providing the pressure for the hydraulic motor. This fully rotated the turret in 15 seconds. Control was from a spade grip on the gun. The same motor provided pressure for the gun stabilizing system.

The 75-mm was operated by a gunner and a loader. Sighting the 75-mm gun used an M1 periscope — with an integral telescope — on the top of the sponson. The periscope rotated with the gun. The sight was marked from zero to 3,000 yd (2,700 m) with vertical markings to aid deflection shooting at a moving target. The gunner laid the gun on target through geared handwheels for traverse and elevation.

The 37-mm was aimed through the M2 periscope, though this was mounted in the mantlet to the side of the gun. It also sighted the coaxial machine gun. Two range scales were provided: 0-1,500 yd (1,400 m) for the 37-mm and 0-1,000 yd (910 m) for the machine gun.

Though not at war, the U.S. was willing to produce, sell and ship armored vehicles to Britain. The British had requested that their Matilda and Crusader tank designs be made by American factories, but this request was declined. With much of their equipment left on the beaches near Dunkirk, the equipment needs of the British were acute. Though not entirely satisfied with the design, they ordered the M3 in large numbers. British experts had viewed the mock-up in 1940 and identified features which they considered flaws — the high profile, the hull mounted main gun, the lack of a radio in the turret (though the tank did have a radio down in the hull), the riveted armor plating (whose rivets tended to pop off inside the interior in a deadly ricochet when the tank was hit by a non-penetrating round), the smooth track design, insufficient armor plating and lack of splash-proofing of the joints. The British desired modifications for the tank they were purchasing, including the turret being cast rather than riveted. A bustle was to be made at the back of the turret to house the Wireless Set No. 19 radio. The tank was to be given thicker armor plate than the original U.S. design, and the machine gun cupola was to be replaced with a simple hatch. With these modifications accepted the British ordered 1,250 M3s. The order was subsequently increased with the expectation that when the M4 Sherman was available it could replace part of the order. Contracts were arranged with three U.S. companies. The total cost of the order was approximately 240 million US dollars. This equaled the sum of all British funds in the US. It took the Lend-Lease act to solve the United Kingdom's shortfall.

The prototype was completed in March 1941 and production models followed with the first British specification tanks produced in July. Both U.S. and British tanks had thicker armor than first planned. The British design required one fewer crew member than the US version due to the radio in the turret. The U.S. eventually eliminated the full-time radio operator, assigning the task to the driver. After extensive losses in Africa and Greece the British realized that to meet their needs for tanks both the Lee and the Grant types would need to be accepted.

The U.S. military used the "M" (Model) letter to designate nearly all of their equipment. When the British Army received their new M3 medium tanks from the US, confusion immediately set in, as the M3 medium tank and the M3 light tank were identically named. The British Army began naming their American tanks after American military figures, although the U.S. Army never used those terms until after the war. M3 tanks with the cast turret and radio setup received the name "General Grant," while the original M3s were called "General Lee," or more usually just "Grant" and "Lee." The M3 brought much-needed firepower to British forces in the North African desert campaign.

The chassis and running gear of the M3 design was adapted by the Canadians for their Ram tank. The hull of the M3 was also used for self-propelled artillery and recovery vehicles.

Of the 6,258 M3s produced by the U.S., 2,855 M3s were supplied to the British Army, and about 1,386 to the Soviet Union. The American M3 medium tank's first action during the war was in 1942, during the North African Campaign. British Lees and Grants were in action against Rommel's forces at the Battle of Gazala on 27 May that year. Their appearance was a surprise to the Germans, who were unprepared for the M3s 75 mm gun. They soon discovered the M3 could engage them beyond the effective range of their 5 cm Pak 38 anti-tank gun, and the 5 cm KwK 39 of the Panzer III, their main medium tank. The M3 was also vastly superior to the Fiat M13/40 and M14/41 tanks employed by the Italian troops, whose 47 mm gun was effective only at point blank range, while only the few Semoventi da 75/18 self-propelled guns were able to destroy it using HEAT rounds. Grants and Lees served with the British in North Africa until the end of the campaign. Following Operation Torch (the invasion of French North Africa), the U.S. also fought in North Africa using the M3 Lee. The U.S. 1st Armored Division had given up their new M4 Shermans to the British prior to the Second Battle of El Alamein. Subsequently, a regiment of the division was still using the M3 Lee when they arrived to fight in North Africa. The M3 was generally appreciated during the North African campaign for its mechanical reliability, good armor protection and heavy firepower.

In all three areas, the M3 was able to engage German tanks and towed anti-tank guns. Yet the tall silhouette and low, hull-mounted 75-mm were tactical drawbacks, since they prevented fighting from a hull-down firing position. The use of riveted hull superstructure armor on the early versions led to spalling, where the impact of enemy shells caused the rivets to break off and become projectiles inside the tank. Later models were built with all-welded armor to eliminate this problem. These lessons were applied to the design and production of the M4. The M3 was replaced by the M4 Sherman as soon as the M4 was available, though several M3s saw limited action in the battle for Normandy as armored recovery vehicles; their armament replaced with dummy guns.

As the Soviets used diesel fuel for their tanks, the 1,300 M3A3 and M3A5s were supplied to the USSR with General Motors-built twin diesel engines. These were supplied through the Lend-Lease program in 1942-1943. All were Lee variants, although the Soviets sometimes referred to them generically as Grants. The M3 was unpopular in the Red Army, which already used the more modern T-34. The faults of the M3 Lee revealed themselves in engagements against enemy armor and anti-tank weapons; the Soviet tankers gave it the nickname "a grave for six men." With the Soviet Union producing close to 1,500 T-34s a month, their use of the M3 Lee declined after mid-1943. The Soviets still used them on secondary fronts, such as in the Arctic during the Red Army's Petsamo–Kirkenes Offensive in October 1944.

The Pacific War was an ocean war fought primarily by the naval fleets of the U.S. and the Empire of Japan. Tank warfare played a secondary role as the primary battles were between warships and between aircraft. In the Pacific Ocean Theater and Southwest Pacific Theater, the U.S. Army deployed only a third of its 70 separate tank battalions, and none of its armored divisions, while the U.S. Marine Corps deployed all six of its tank battalions.

When the British Army received M4 Shermans, about 900 M3 tanks were transferred to the Indian Army and some of these saw action in the war in South East Asia. British Lees and Grants were used by the British Fourteenth Army until the fall of Rangoon, performing "admirably" in Burma in 1944-45, in its original role: supporting infantry. In the Far East, the M3's main task was infantry support. It played a pivotal role during the Battle of Imphal, during which the Imperial Japanese Army's 14th Tank Regiment (consisting of mostly captured British M3 Stuart light tanks and their own Type 95 Ha-Go light tanks) encountered M3 medium tanks for the first time and found itself outgunned and outmatched by the British armor. Despite their lower-than-average off-road performance, the M3s performed well as they traversed the steep hillsides around Imphal. Officially declared obsolete in April 1944, the Lee nevertheless saw action until the end of the war.

The Australian Army also received approximately 1,700 M3 Grants that had originally been part of a UK order. The Australian Armoured Corps had been formed in 1941 to take part in the North African Campaign, but was retained in Australia after the outbreak of hostilities with Japan. In 1941–42, the cadres of three armored divisions were formed – all of them were equipped partly with the M3 Grant – in addition to M3 Stuart light tanks. In April and May 1942, the 1st Armoured Division's regiments began re-equipping with M3 Grants and completed their training in a series of large exercises around Narrabri, New South Wales. The 2nd and 3rd Armoured Divisions were officially formed in 1942 and were also partly equipped with M3 Grants. In January 1943, the main body of the 1st Armoured Division was deployed to home defense duties between Perth and Geraldton, Western Australia, where it formed part of III Corps. However, the Grants were deemed unsuitable for combat duties overseas and M3 units were re-equipped with the Matilda II service before being deployed to the New Guinea and Borneo Campaigns. Due to personnel shortages, all three divisions were officially disbanded during 1943 and downgraded to brigade- and battalion-level units.

During the battle for Tarawa island in 1943, the US Army attacked nearby Makin Island, which was considered a less costly operation. The army was supported by a platoon of M3A5 Lee medium tanks from the US Army's 193rd Tank Battalion, making this battle the only combat use of the M3 by America in the Pacific Theater. The US Marine Corps did not use M3 Lees; their light tank battalions were equipped with M3 Stuarts until they were replaced by M4 Shermans in mid-1944.

During the war, the Australian Army had converted some M3 Grants for special purposes, including a small number of bulldozer variants, beach armored recovery vehicles and wader prototypes.

Following the end of the war 14 of the Australian Grants were converted to a local self-propelled gun design, the Yeramba, becoming the only SPG ever deployed by the Australian Army. Fitted with a 25-pounder field gun, the Yerambas remained in service with the 22nd Field Regiment, Royal Australian Artillery, until the late 1950s.

Many M3s deemed surplus to Australian Army requirements were acquired by civilian buyers during the 1950s and 1960s for conversion to earthmoving equipment and/or tractors.

Overall, the M3 was able to cope with the battlefield of 1942. Its armor and firepower were the equal or superior to most of the threats it faced, especially in the Pacific. Long-range, high velocity guns were not yet common on German tanks in the African theater. However, the rapid pace of tank development meant that the M3 was very quickly outclassed. By mid-1942, with the introduction of the German Tigers, the up-gunning of the Panzer IV to a long 75-mm gun, and the first appearance in 1943 of the Panthers, along with the availability of large numbers of Shermans, the M3 was withdrawn from service in the European Theater.

In the 1943 movie Sahara, starring Humphrey Bogart, the character's main form of transportation was an M3 Lee named "Lulu Belle"; the same is true of the 1995 remake starring Jim Belushi. The 1995 remake used a similar M3 Grant lookalike.

In Season 1 Episode 2 (Hold That Tiger) of Hogan's Heroes, the Tiger tank is actually an M3 Lee.

In the 1979 Steven Spielberg movie 1941, starring Dan Akroyd and John Belushi, an M3 Lee is a featured element.

Specifications

Type: Medium tank

Place of origin: United States

Wars: World War II

Produced: August 1941 – December 1942

Number built: 6,258

Weight: 30 short tons (27 t)

Length: 18 ft 6 in (5.64 m)

Width: 8 ft 11 in (2.72 m)

Height: 10 ft 3 in (3.12 m) – Lee

Crew: 7 (Lee); 6 (Grant)

Armor:

51 mm (hull front, turret front, sides, and rear)

38 mm (hull sides and rear)

Main armament:

1 × 75 mm Gun M2/M3 in hull; 46 rounds

1 × 37mm Gun M5/M6 in turret; 178 rounds

Secondary armament: 2-3–4 × .30-06 Browning M1919A4 machine guns; 9,200 rounds

Engine: Wright (Continental) R975 EC2; 400 hp (300 kW)/340 hp (250 kW)

Transmission: Mack Synchromesh, 5 speeds forward, 1 reverse

Suspension: vertical volute spring

Ground clearance: 18 in (0.46 m)

Fuel capacity: 662 liters (175 US gallons)

Operational range: 193 km (119 mi)

Speed: 26 mph (42 km/h) (road); 16 mph (26 km/h) (off-road)

Steering system: Controlled differential

Variants

U.S. Variants

M3 (Lee I/Grant I): Riveted hull, high profile turret, gasoline engine. 4,724 built.

M3A1 (Lee II): Cast (rounded) upper hull. 300 built.

M3A2 (Lee III): Welded (sharp edged) hull. Only 12 vehicles produced.

M3A3 (Lee IV/Lee V): Twin GM 6-71 diesel variant of welded hull. Side doors welded shut or eliminated. 322 built.

M3A4 (Lee VI): Stretched riveted hull, 1 x Chrysler A-57 Multibank engine, made up of five 4.12 liter displacement, 6-cyl L-head car engines (block upwards) mated to a common crankshaft, displacement 21 liters, 470 hp at 2,700 rpm. Side doors eliminated. 109 built.

M3A5 (Grant II): Twin GM 6-71 diesel variant of riveted hull M3. Although it had the original Lee turret and not the Grant one, was referred by the British as Grant II. 591 built.

M31 Tank Recovery Vehicle (Grant ARV I): Based on M3 chassis, with dummy turret and dummy 75 gun. A 60,000 lb (27,000 kg) winch installed.

M31B1 Tank Recovery Vehicle: Based on M3A3.

M31B2 Tank Recovery Vehicle: Based on M3A5.

M33 Prime Mover: M31 TRV converted to the artillery tractor role, with turret and crane removed. 109 vehicles were converted in 1943-44.

105 mm Howitzer Motor Carriage M7 (Priest): 105 mm M1/M2 howitzer installed in open superstructure. A gunless version was used as an OP (observation post vehicle)

155 mm Gun Motor Carriage M12: Designed as the T6. A 155 mm howitzer on M3 chassis. 100 built in 1942-1943. M30 Cargo Carrier on same chassis to transport gun crew and ammunition.

British Variants

Grant ARV: Grant I and Grant UK models with guns removed and replaced with armored recovery vehicle equipment.

Grant Command: Grant fitted with map table and extra radio equipment and having guns removed or replaced with dummies.

Grant Scorpion III: Grant with 75 mm gun removed, and fitted with Scorpion III mine flail, few made in early 1943 for use in North Africa.

Grant Scorpion IV: Grant Scorpion III with additional motor to increase Scorpion flail power.

Grant CDL: From "Canal Defence Light"; Grants with the 37 mm gun turret replaced by a new turret containing a powerful searchlight and a machine gun. 355 were also produced by the Americans, who designated it the Shop Tractor T10.

Australian Variants

M3 BARV: A single M3A5 Grant tank was converted into a "Beach Armoured Recovery Vehicle."

Yeramba Self Propelled Gun: Australian SP 25 pounder. 13 vehicles built in 1949 on M3A5 chassis in a conversion very similar to the Canadian Sexton.

Early production model M3 Medium Tank.

Medium Tank M3A1.

M3A1 Medium Tank.

M3 Medium Tanks, England, 1942.

Aside from the 1st Armored Division, the only other U.S. unit to use the M3 Medium Tank in combat in Tunisia was the 751st Tank Battalion that supported the 34th Infantry Division. This unit painted large tactical numbers edged in white on the rear of their turrets as seen here. Tunisia, February 1943.

M3 Medium Tank in repair depot.

M3 Medium Tank, 1st Armored Division, Tunisia, November 1942.

M3 Medium Tank, "Kentucky," North Africa, 1942.

Crew of Medium Tank M3 (309490), D Company, 2nd Battalion, 12th Armored Regiment, 1st Armored Division, Souk el Arba, Tunisia. 23 November 1942.

Crew of M3 Medium Tank (309503), 2nd Battalion, 12th Artillery Regiment, 1st Armored Division, Souk el Arba, Tunisia, November 1942.

M3 Medium Tank, 1st Armored Division, Tunis.

M3 Medium Tank on 50-ton Raft, Medium M1, circa March 1942.

M3 Medium Tanks on Butaritari. A medical team waits beside their jeep for the tanks to pass.

Medium Tank M3.

M3 medium tank during training.

M3 medium tanks with other vehicles, Iron Mountain, California.

M3 medium tank during training.

M3 medium tank during training.

Crewman of an M3 medium tank on washday during training in the desert.

Crewmen of an M3 medium tank dig a slit trench in the desert during training.

The tank commander of an M3 medium tank takes a drink of water from a lister bag.

The crewman of an M3 medium tank prepares a meal in the desert during training.

M3 medium tanks.

M3 Medium Tank.

M3A1 Medium Tank.

Late production M3 Medium Tank.

M3s during maneuvers in England, 1942.

M3s during maneuvers in England, 1942.

M3 medium tank.

M3 medium tank.

M3 medium tank.

Interior of M3 medium tank.

Wooden mock-up of M3 medium tank.

Crewman drinks water from a canteen in front of his M3 medium tank.

 
M3, Fort Knox, Kentucky.

Soldiers recover a M3 medium tank from the Cumberland River, 19 October 1942, after it sank during an attempted crossing.

M3 medium tanks, Fort Benning, Georgia.

M3 medium tank, Fort Knox, Kentucky.

M3 medium tank after being struck by a train, U.S. southwest.

Repairing an M3 medium tank at night.

Ordnance men repairing the engine of an M3 medium tank.

Crewmen load ammunition for the .30-caliber machine gun into an M3 medium tank.

Medium Tank M3.

Appliqué plate. A cast armor plate of 44mm thickness conforming to the shape of the final drive housing of the M3 medium Grant (Diesel) tank was produced to give immunity from attack by Japanese anti-tank guns.

Medium Tank (M3) "Grant" with the turret designed for British service, 15 July 1941.

M3A3 Medium Tank.

M3 medium tanks in North Africa.

M3 Lee tanks of the 1st Armored Regiment moving forward to help strengthen the Allied garrison in Kasserine Pass, 20 February 1943.

Medium Tank M3A1 "Lee."

M3A1 medium tank.

M3A1 medium tank.

M3A2 medium tank.

M3A3 medium tank, with 75mm gun in hull and 37mm gun in turret.

M3A5 medium tank.

M3A5 medium tank.

Medium Tank M3A5 "Lee."

M3 medium tank in Soviet service.

Medium Tank M3.

Chrysler Tank Arsenal. Thousands of rivets are used in the production of one of the huge 38-ton Medium Tank M3. Whenever possible rivets are replaced by welded sections, but throughout much of the tank, as in the side plates on which this riveter is working, the steel plate is too heavy for welding.

British M3 Grant (left) and Lee (right) in the Western Desert, 1942, showing differences between the British turret and the original design. Grant and Lee tanks of 'C' Squadron, 4th (Queen's Own) Hussars, 2nd Armoured Brigade, El Alamein position, Egypt, 7 July 1942.

A pair of Soviet M3 Lees at the Battle of Kursk.

Workers in the huge Chrysler Tank Arsenal near Detroit, putting the tracks on one of the giant M3 Medium Tanks. These rolling arsenals weigh 28 tons, are capable of speeds over 25 miles an hour and are equipped with 75mm field artillery gun and a 37mm anti-aircraft gun, as well as four mounted machine guns and various unmounted arms its crew may carry. The tanks are powered by 400 horsepower Wright Whirlwind aviation engines.

The riveted construction of the Medium Tank M3 is obvious here. This vehicle is not fitted with stabilization since it lacks counterweights on the 37mm or short 75mm M2 guns. The machine gun in the commander's cupola is present in its right aperture, and one of the driver's hull machine guns has been retained. Track grousers are stored in the box below the driver's hatch, and the tank's siren is positioned below the 75mm gun. Here the crew, Cpl. Larry Corletti, Pvt. Murril Chapman, and Pvt. Louis Robles, practice dismounting from a disabled vehicle.

Overhead view of the pilot M3 medium tank. The early production vehicles lacked the rear stowage bins. A towing cable and tools are stowed on the rear deck, and the filler covers for the four fuel tanks can be seen on each side of the engine air intake grille.

This early-production tank is fitted with pepperpot-style exhaust mufflers.

A cross-section view of the M3 Medium Tank. This tank also has the early exhaust and air cleaner setup.

Details of the mounting of the twin hull machine guns are shown in this image.

The various components of the 75 mm gun stabilizer are outlined here.

Medium Tank M3 "Lee": The location of the tank's armament and ammunition stowage is sketched here. The key for the figure is as follows: 1. Driver's seat. 2. Radio operator's seat. 3. 75-mm gunner's seat. 4. 37-mm gunner's seat. 5. 37-mm loader's seat. 6. Tank commander's seat. 8. Cal. .30 machine gun. 9. Cal. .30 machine gun. 10. 37-mm gun. 11. 75-mm gun. 12. 2 cal. .30 machine guns. 13. Protectoscopes. 14. 51 rounds 37-mm ammunition carried in turret. 15. 13 rounds 37-mm ammunition. 16. 11 rounds 37-mm ammunition. 17. 42 rounds 37-mm ammunition. 18. Ten 100-round belts cal. .30 ammunition. 19. 20 rounds 37-mm ammunition. 20. Fourteen 250-round belts containing 225 rounds cal. .30 ammunition. 21. Two 250-round belts containing 225 rounds cal. .30 ammunition. 22. Twenty-five 100-round belts cal. .30 ammunition. 23. 41 rounds 75-mm ammunition; six 100-round belts cal. .30 ammunition. 24. 42 rounds 37-mm ammunition. 25. Submachine gun. 26. Submachine gun. Carried in tank but not shown on drawing are 9 rounds 75 mm ammunition carried in cartons and twenty-four 50-round clips cal. .45 ammunition."


M3 and its contribution to other AFVs of the Second World War.

The parts of the stabilizer for the 37 mm gun are detailed here.

The M3A2 Medium Tank was the first of the series to feature a welded hull. The sharp lines and lack of riveting are obvious.

M3A3 Medium Tank was essentially an M3A5 with a welded rather than riveted hull. The sharp lines on the hull of this tank indicates that it has been welded rather than cast.

M31 TRV (Tank Recovery Vehicle) showing dummy hull gun. Based on the M3 chassis, with dummy turret and dummy 75 gun. 60,000 lb (27,000 kg) winch installed. In British service was known as the Grant ARV I (Armoured Recovery Vehicle). There was also the M31B1 TRV based on the M3A3 Medium Tank chassis, and the M31B2 TRV based on the M3A5 Medium Tank chassis.

A Grant Command variant used by General Montgomery housed at the Imperial War Museum in London. The Grant Command Tank was fitted with a map table and extra radio equipment and having guns removed or replaced with dummies.

Grant Dozer in Royal Australian Armoured Corps Tank Museum, Puckapunyal, Victoria, Australia.

75mm gun as mounted in the Medium Tank M3 Lee/Grant in the Royal Australian Armoured Corps Tank Museum, Puckapunyal, Victoria, Australia.

Australian M3 BARV (Beach Armoured Recovery Vehicle) in the Royal Australian Armoured Corps Tank Museum, Puckapunyal, Victoria, Australia. Only one vehicle was built, converted from an M3A5 Grant.

M3 BARV in Royal Australian Armoured Corps Tank Museum, Puckapunyal, Victoria, Australia.

M3 BARV in Royal Australian Armoured Corps Tank Museum, Puckapunyal, Victoria, Australia.

37mm gun as mounted in the M3 Medium Tank Lee/Grant in the Royal Australian Armoured Corps Tank Museum, Puckapunyal, Victoria, Australia.

Medium Tank M3A5 Lee: The legend for this cross-sectional view is as follows: 1. Oil cooler adapter. 2. Oil cooler. 3. Blower housing. 4. Blower rotors. 5. Air cleaner. 6. Secondary fuel filter. 7. Camshaft. 8. Rocker arm. 9. Injector. 10. Injector control rack tube lever. 11. Water outlet manifold. 12. Exhaust manifold. 13. Balancer shaft. 14. Valve rocker cover. 15. Push rod. 16. Section of piston and connecting rod. 17. Air box. 18. Solenoid air inlet control. 19. Air inlet housing. 20. Connecting rod bearing shell. 21. Crankshaft. 22. Main bearing shell. 23. Lubricating oil pump assembly. 24. Lubricating oil pump driven gear. 25. Air heater. 26. Air heater fuel pipe. 27. Clutch shift levers.


M3A4 Medium Tank "Lee": The large Chrysler multibank engine installed in the M3A4 necessitated a longer hull to fit in the tank. The distance between the bogies was also therefore increased, and the rear deck roof and engine compartment floor had bulges to accommodate the A57 engine.

Medium Tank M3A5 Lee: This is a ¾ front view of the GM 6046 engine. The power from each engine was sent through its drive shaft and gear to a common driven gear which in turn drove the propeller shaft. The individual engines were designated model 671LA24M (right-side engine) and 671LC24M (left-side engine). The engine weight as installed was 4855lb (2202kg).

M3 Medium Tank in North Africa.

M3 Medium Tank, Aberdeen Proving Ground.

M3 Medium Tank knocked out in North Africa.

M3A3 Medium Tank.

The legend for this cross-sectional view is as follows: A. Tube, water pump air relief (engine no. 1 to no. 2). B. Coil, ignition, assembly (no. 1 engine). C. Cleaner, air, crankcase ventilator, assembly. D. Shaft, drive, tachometer. E. Pump, water, assembly (no. 1 to no. 5 engine). F. Tube, water pump air relief (no. 1 engine). G. Filter, oil (absorption type). H. Coil, ignition (no. 5 engine). I. Pipe, exhaust (nos. 4 and 5 engines). J. Tube, fuel pump to branch connection, assembly (for nos. 4 and 5 carburetors). K. Connection, water pump air relief tube. L. Pump, water, assembly (no. 5 engine). M. Distributor, ignition, assembly (no. 5 engine). N. Tube, water pump air relief (no. 4 to no. 5 engine). O. Tube, fuel pump to no. 1 carburetor, assembly. P. Plate, serial number, engine. Q. Pump, fuel, assembly. R. Coil, ignition, assembly (no. 4 engine). S. Support, engine, rear. T. Pump, water, assembly (no. 4 engine). U. Tube, radiator outlet, assembly (nos. 4 and 5 engines). V. Distributor, ignition, assembly (no. 4 engine). W. Pan, oil. X. Plug, drain, oil pan. Y. Tube, fuel pump to branch connection, assembly (for nos. 2 and 3 carburetors). Z. Distributor, ignition, assembly (no. 3 engine). AA. Pump, water, assembly (no. 3 engine). BB. Tube, radiator outlet, assembly (nos. 2 and 3 engines). CC. Coil, ignition, assembly (no. 3 engine). DD. Cock, drain, cylinder water jacket, assembly. EE. Distributor, ignition, assembly (no. 2 engine). FF. Tube, water pump air relief (no. 2 to no. 3 engine). GG. Pump, water, assembly (no. 2 engine). HH. Coil, ignition, assembly (no. 2 engine). II. Distributor, ignition, assembly (no. 1 engine). JJ. Generator, assembly. KK. Pipe, exhaust (nos. 1, 2, and 3 engines).


A cross-section view of the M3A5 Medium Tank "Lee." This tank also has the early exhaust and air cleaner setup.

M3A5 Medium Tank.

Workers putting tracks on M3 Medium Tanks at Chrysler Tank Arsenal.

M31 Tank Recovery Vehicle (TRV) at Aberdeen Proving Ground.

A Grant ARV of the New Zealand Division lifts a Daimler scout car which had become bogged down in the mud near Faenza, 7 February 1945.

M3 Medium Tank, Fort Knox. Maintenance of mechanized equipment. Tanks, as well as the Army's trucks, motorcycles and other motorized equipment, pay regular visits to the wash rack. Wherever possible, modern military vehicles are kept in spic and span condition and mechanically ready for strenuous action.

M3 Medium Tank and crew in Tunisia.

A rear view of the No. 1 pilot M3 Medium Tank built at Rock Island Arsenal shows the original exhaust con-figuration with the pepperpot exhausts.

An M3 Medium Tank of Company A, 751st Tank Battalion, moves through Bizerte during the final fighting of the Tunisian campaign. This is an interesting view as it shows an ALCO built tank with untypical steel tracks, and a partial array of grouser stowage boxes with only one on the glacis, not the usual two. It is armed with the later and longer M3 75mm gun.

M3 Medium Tank of Company C, 69th Armored, 1st Armored Division, in November 1941 during the Carolina maneuvers. The 1st Armored Division used the Armored Force triangle insignia carried on the glacis plate and in the rear on the engine access doors, with the company tactical letter/number on the upper glacis and split on the hull rear.

U.S. Ordnance liaison team in Egypt with British officers. Captain Bill Summerbell (in the pith helmet) and Lt.Col. G. B. Jarrett (in garrison cap) who was instrumental in founding the Ordnance Museum at Aberdeen Proving Ground. The Lee is fitted with British manufactured sand shields and has a stringer with loops attached to fit the sunshade lorry disguise.

A British Lee in early non-standard camouflage at the ordnance school outside Cairo, Egypt, in 1941. It is fitted with WD-212 rubber blocked track.

Good view of D-11 (W-305797) of Company D, 67th Armored Regiment, 2nd Armored Division, during the Carolina maneuvers, on 5 November 1941. The 2nd Armored Division used a national insignia the reverse of the more familiar Army Air Corps style with the roundel in red instead of blue. This was carried on the hull sides, turret rear, and glacis plate. The company letter/numbers are on the turret side. The registration numbers are probably in blue drab. This marking quickly disappeared after the Pearl Harbor attack due to the fear that the red circle could lead to misidentification. The crew wear early pattern tankers helmets.

Another example of M3 tanks of the 3rd Battalion, 13th Armored Regiment, in action in the Spring of 1943. The rear markings on this tank identify it as belonging to the 2nd Platoon, Company I, 3rd Battalion, 13th Armored Regiment. By this time, U.S. tanks were camouflaging their tank by painting them with swathes of mud.

Although 2nd Battalion, 13th Armored Regiment, was first unit into combat with the M3 Medium Tank, the type was later used by other elements of the division; a tank of Company H, 3rd Battalion, 13th Armored Regiment, seen here in Tunisia on 8 February 1943. The tactical markings of the 3rd Battalion used a slanted rectangle instead of the vertical rectangle of the 2nd Battalion.

An interesting photo that shows the wooden mock-up or pattern for the M3 Medium Tank turret casting. As can be seen, a vertical protrusion is evident on the turret side under the commander's cupola, and a bulge is also evident further forward on the turret reinforcing the trunnion.

This interior view of a M3 Medium Tank pilot cupola shows the ammunition belt feed assembly for the .30 cal. machine gun.

An interesting view looking down into the turret basket on an early production M3 Medium Tank.

A nice close-up showing details of the cupola of a M3 Medium Tank of Company D, 67th Tank Battalion, commanded by Sergeant William Meek in early 1942. The hatch folded in two with the front portion folding below where it was held in place with a small spring-actuated clip.

An interesting factory view inside the hull of a M3 Medium Tank showing the 75mm gun position more clearly since the turret is not yet fitted.

An interesting photo shows an M2 75mm gun and mounting removed from the tank.

M3 Medium Tank in Soviet service, 1943-44.

M3 Medium Tank in Soviet service, Kerch peninsula, June 1944. Note the M3 Light Tank in the rear.

Grant (M3) Medium Tank of the British 4th Armoured Brigade in North Africa in February 1942. The second vehicle is a Stuart (M3) Light Tank.

An American tanker cleans the 75mm gun of a M3 Medium Tank in Tunisia during the winter of 1942-43.

The Grant I was a M3 Medium Tank with a new turret according to British requirements.

Standard M3 Medium Tanks were referred to by the British Army as a Lee I. Sandbags were installed to provide additional protection to the rather thin armor on the production vehicles in the Middle East.

A Soviet M3 Medium Tank destroyed on the Eastern Front in the summer of 1943. The tank was not particularly popular with the Russians because of its obsolete weapons arrangement.

M3 Medium Tank first pilot, at Aberdeen Proving Ground, March 1941.

Grant Medium Tanks in British service under repair in a workshop. Nearest vehicle is T26084, "A11."

Comparison photo of M3 Medium Tank and pilot model of M4A1 Medium Tank (minus armament).