1st SS Panzer Regiment (11-24 December 1944): Interview with Joachim Peiper

Obersturmbannführer Jochen Peiper wearing his Knights Cross with Oakleaves.

U.S. Army

The following is a reprint of ETHINT 10 prepared by the U.S. Army. Copy obtained from the National Archives, Washington, D.C.

Title: 1 SS Panzer Regiment (11-24 December 1944).

Source: Obst. (W-SS) Peiper, Joachim.

Position: Commander, 1 SS Panzer Regiment, 1 SS Panzer Division.

Date: 7 September 1945.

Place: Freising, Germany.

Interviewer: Major Kenneth W. Hechler.

Circumstances: Obst. Peiper is a very arrogant, typical SS man, thoroughly imbued with the Nazi philosophy. He is very proud of his regiment and division and is inclined to make derogatory remarks about other units. He is possibly frightened about his future disposition. As soon as it became apparent that our conver­sation would be confined to military tactics and not his war crimes, he opened up. He speaks good English and took particular delight in correcting the interpreter. Physically, he is not as tall as published reports indicate.

Overall Condition of the Regiment Prior to the Offensive

What was the condition of your division immediately prior to the launching of the Ardennes Offensive?

It was badly mangled in the Normandy fighting and in the retreat across France. Before the Ardennes Offensive, we had about two months to reorganize our troops in the Minden area of Westphalia.

What new troops did you receive during this re-organization period?

We got about 3,500 new combat troops, bringing the division up to full T/O strength of 22,000 men.

How good were the new troops which you received?

Pretty good considering the state of the German reinforcements assigned at that time.

What new materiel did you receive prior to the Ardennes Offensive?

We got many new tanks directly from the assembly line. However, the regiment was supposed to have one battalion of Mark IVs and one battalion of Panther tanks, and, not having enough tanks, I organized one battalion with a mixture of two companies of Mark IVs and two companies of Panther tanks. To compensate for the shortage of tanks, my regiment was further reinforced with a battalion of Tiger tanks which had formerly been corps troops. Therefore, the regiment finally consisted of one battalion of mixed Panther and Mark IV tanks, one battalion of Tiger tanks, and one battalion of SS personnel without tanks. My regiment was the panzer regiment of 1 SS Panzer Division; the other two were infantry regiments.

How many additional tanks did you receive as reinforcements during the period when you re-organized in the Minden area?

Prior to coming to Westphalia we had about fifty tanks. We received about two hundred additional tanks during the period of re-equipment.

First Inkling of the Offensive

When did you first hear about the plans to launch an offensive in the Ardennes?

Unofficially, I deduced the fact five days before the start of the offensive. Officially, I was informed two days before it began—on 14 December 1944.

How did you deduce it unofficially?

Kraemer, Chief of Staff of Sixth SS Panzer Army, asked me on 11 December 1944 what I thought about the possibilities of an attack in the Eifel region, and how much time it would take a tank regiment to proceed 80 kilometers in one night. Feeling that it was not a good idea to decide the answer to such a question merely by looking at a map, I made a test run of 80 kilometers with a Panther tank myself, driving down the route Euskirchen – Muenstereifel – Blankenheim.

What conclusions did you reach as a result of this test run?

If I had a free road to myself, I could make 80 kilometers in one night. Of course, with an entire division, that was a different question.

Do you believe that Kraemer meant to give away the plan to you?

He actually didn’t, but it was rather obvious what he was up to.

When did you move out of Westphalia?

About three weeks before the Ardennes Offensive, our unit was moved into Army reserve 12 kilometers east of Dueren, north of Euskirchen.

Were you able to accomplish anything in training your unit between the time that Kraemer tipped you off about the impending plans and 16 December 1944?

I could give them a few tips about how to drive tanks through mountainous terrain and over icy roads, but no other training or instructions were possible, because the American forces were then attacking in the Aachen–Dueren area, and we had to remain on the alert as Sixth SS Panzer Army reserve.

Could you make any personal reconnaissance in the Eifel in advance of the offensive?

No, because movement in the Eifel territory was strictly forbidden.

Movement to the Assembly Area

When did you move from the Aachen–Dueren area to the assembly area for the offensive?

On 13 December 1944, we were given a detailed march order issued by I SS Panzer Corps. No mention of the impending offensive was contained in this order; nothing was mentioned except the route of march and the assembly area.

Where was the assembly area for 1 SS Panzer Division as a whole?

Marmegen – Blankenheimerdorf – Schmidtheim. Advance elements of the division were in Dahlem.

What special precautions were taken to conceal the movement?

The whole thing was to be announced to the troops only when they fell in immediately prior to departure. There was complete blackout during the night and radio silence. No signs marked the road other than simple yellow arrows without division designation.

At what time did you move out, and what time did you close in your new assembly area?

We moved out at 1900 on 13 December 1944 and had disappeared into the woods in our assembly area by 1000 on 14 December 1944.

Were there any unusual incidents en route? Were there any air attacks or American recon­nais­sance planes?

The weather was too foggy for any air activity, and it was still very foggy at 1000 when we closed in our assembly area.

What forces were on your flanks?

The 12 SS Panzer Division was on the north, and 2 Panzer Division on the south.

Plans and Preparations for the Offensive

What was the first conference held after your arrival in the new assembly area?

Before noon on 14 December 1944, I was called to Tondorf, the command post of 1 SS Panzer Division, where Oberst Mohnke, the division commander, announced the whole plan for the offensive and read the detailed corps order assigning various routes and fixing the morning of 16 December 1944 as D-Day.

What divisions did you have in I SS Panzer Corps?

The 1 and 12 SS Panzer Divisions; 2 Panzer Division was in the corps to our south.

What additional troops did you have assigned to your division especially for the offensive?

We had one anti-aircraft regiment with 88 mm guns, one additional engineer battalion, and one battalion of corps artillery with 150 mm and 210 mm guns. [Probably 150 mm and 210 mm howitzers. There was no German 210 mm gun, and the 150 mm gun was not normally in corps artillery.]

What was the purpose and mission of the additional engineer battalion?

It was attached primarily for repairing bridges.

What particular bridge did they work on the most?

The railroad bridge northwest of Losheim.

Any additional troops attached?

After 3 FS [Fallschirmjäger] Division got stuck following the start of the offensive, one parachute regiment was attached to our unit. We also had at the start of the offensive special “Skorzeny” units of 150 Panzer Brigade. Each combat team had such a group. They consisted of five hundred men, twenty General Sherman [M4] tanks, a few German tanks, thirty 2½ ton trucks, and thirty to fifty jeeps.

Where had all this American equipment been obtained?

Much of it had been captured during the invasion and had stayed with various units up until October 1944, when a general order was issued to turn in all captured equipment.

Did you have any tactical control over this “Skorzeny” group?

None whatsoever.

What did you think of the value of the performance of the “Skorzeny” group during the offensive?

They might just as well have stayed at home, because they were never near the head of the column where they planned to be.

What indication of the routes was given at the division conference?

Each commanding officer—the commander of the reconnaissance battalion, the commanders of the two infantry regiments, and myself—got a marked map showing the routes of advance.

What area of advance was planned for 1 SS Panzer Division?

Hitler Jugend [12 SS Panzer] Division was on our north, and 2 Panzer Division was on the south. We were ordered to follow this route: Schmidtheim – Dahlem – Kronenburg – Hall­schlag – Scheid – Losheim – Losheimergraben – Huenningen – Honsfeld – Hepscheid – Moder­scheid – Schoppen – Ondenval – Thirimont – Ligneu­ville – Pont – Trois-Ponts – Werbomont – Ouffet – Seny – Tinlot – Stree – Huy.

How good was this route compared with the routes of the divisions to your north and south?

The roads assigned to the two divisions on my flanks followed main routes and were very good. The roads assigned to my division were generally known to be bad, but there were few bridges along the way.

Did you not object?

I immediately pointed out that these roads were not for tanks, but were for bicycles, but they wouldn’t even discuss it. They said it was the Führer’s order that I should take that route.

What routes of advance were assigned for 12 SS Panzer Division and 2 Panzer Division?

I did not know the route planned for 2 Panzer Division. In general, 12 SS Panzer Division planned to use the route Buellingen – But­gen­bach – Waimes – Malmédy – Spa – Louveigne – Meuse River.

What additional instructions or advice were you given at the division conference?

They said that my combat team in the center was to have the decisive role in the offensive. I was not to bother about my flanks but was to drive rapidly to the Meuse River, making full use of the element of surprise.

It was further announced that two train loads of gasoline urgently needed for the offen­sive had not arrived, and, accordingly, orders were issued to all the units to supply themselves with captured gasoline.

Did you know where to expect to find this captured gasoline?

Our division intelligence officer had a situation map purporting to show your supply instal­lations. We believed from that map that we could capture gasoline at Buellingen and Stavelot.

Did you realize that you came within 300 yards of a three million gallon gasoline dump at Spa?

[With a typical gesture Obst. Peiper shrugged his shoulders, smiled rather arrogantly, and said in English, “I am sorry.” He didn’t know of the existence of the gasoline dump.]

Did you have enough ammunition for the offensive?

I obtained some ammunition myself in Euskirchen, and we had enough to last up until the fourth or fifth day.

Did you have any other shortages?

No.

What else occurred at the division meeting?

The division commander repeated most of Hitler’s speech of 12 December 1944 to division commanders.

What did you do following the meeting?

I sat down and decided how to organize my own combat team. I decided that my column would be about 25 kilometers long, and the vehicles would proceed at medium speed. It was impossible for the vehicles in the rear to overtake those in the front because of the bad roads. Therefore, all combat elements had to be placed in the front of the column. In order to provide maximum speed and power, I decided that my armored half-tracks would proceed as fast as possible until they met resistance and then the tanks would come up to destroy the resistance, following which the half-tracks would again advance. I expected that if all went well I would need only Mark IVs and Panthers to proceed through the mountains and to reach the Meuse River, with one panzer company. Then I could move up the heavy Tiger tanks later. [The exact meaning of the last two sentences is unknown.]

Did you honestly expect to reach the Meuse River in one day?

[Obst. Peiper paused for a brief period before answering and wrinkled his brow.] If our own infantry had broken through by 0700 as originally planned, my answer is “yes,” I think we might have reached the Meuse in one day.

What happened following your company of initial plans on 14 December 1944?

On the afternoon of 14 December 1944, I drove over to confer with the commander of 12 Volks Grenadier Division, whose infantry was sup­posed to crack the initial line. We developed a joint plan. General Major Engel, commander of 12 Volks Grenadier Division, explained that he hoped to achieve the initial penetration by 0700 hours. I then asked General Major Engel to clear the main road of mines in the area of Losheim.

What else did General Major Engel tell you of his plans for the attack of 12 Volks Grenadier Division?

He said that he had a heavy artillery concen­tration ready to destroy the American front line positions. He then said that he would attack with two regiments and actually reach Losheim by 0700 hours.

What else did you do on 14 December 1944?

Merely general preparations, such as looking up supply routes.

When was the next conference?

At 1100 on 15 December 1944 there was a conference at I SS Panzer Corps, consisting of the division commanders, the commanders of all the combat teams, and Skorzeny. General­leutnant (W-SS) Preiss, the corps commander, gave a short “pep” talk explaining the importance of the offensive; the chief of staff, General [actually Ostbf.] Lehmann repeated the attack order, announced that the expected gasoline had not yet arrived, but that the Führer had insisted that the offensive start on 16 December 1944, notwithstanding.

What did you think happened to that gasoline?

Oh, I guess it was delayed, re-routed, and may have arrived later on in some other area, but we never saw it.

Following this, I had a conference of my own commanders, plus Skorzeny’s deputy and eight or nine of his representatives. I explained the plan and its importance, that there were three main spearheads in our area, and that, of course, my combat team would be the first to reach the Meuse River. Then I explained the route to be taken, the march order, and the time each unit was to pass the IP (one kilometer southwest of Schmidtheim). Then I announced the signal SOP, and assigned wave lengths.

Was there anything unusual about your signal SOP?

The only unusual thing was that the distances involved were cut in half because of the necessity for the radio waves to travel through moun­tainous territory. [The preceding sentence is repro­duced verbatim from the available record.]

What other orders or instructions did you issue?

I issued orders against firing into small groups of the enemy and forbidding looting. I ordered this because we could not afford to lose time. I then questioned Hardecka, Skorzeny’s deputy, on the mission of his group. Hardecka explained that this group would try to overtake the leading tanks as soon as possible, would then infiltrate to cause confusion among the American troops, would drop off fake MPs to direct American traffic, seize command posts, centers of com­muni­cation, and a bridge over the Meuse River at either Huy or Ombret Rausa with a single coup.

What special precautions did Skorzeny’s men take to protect themselves against being fired on by German troops?

Tanks were to point their guns at nine o’clock and to leave them in that position throughout the journey, without any shooting at first. All soldiers were to take off their steel helmets. All vehicles had small yellow triangles in the rear.

Beginning of the Attack

How did the attack proceed on 16 December 1944?

The route which we actually took was as follows: Schmidtheim – through to the railroad bridge northwest of Losheim, the same as the original plan; then we backtracked and took a secondary road to Lanzerath then through the woods in a northwesterly direction to Honsfeld – Buellingen – Richelsbusch; then along the planned route through Ligneuville; then through Pont – Stavelot – Trois Ponts – La Gleize and Stoumont.

The infantry was to open a gap through the MLR [Main Line of Resistance], and we were then to break through. At 0500 the infantry jumped off. The drive was poor, and the infantry had to bypass numerous nests of resistance which caused considerable trouble after they had been bypassed. When we started, we found that these nests of resistance also caused us quite a bit of trouble. There were many mines in the roads also.

How strong was the resistance of the American infantry?

Your 99th Infantry Division put up very light resistance. In fact, the resistance was so light that it was a pity to have wasted so much artillery on them.

Where did you go when the attack started?

At 0500 I moved to the command post of General Major Engel to observe his attack, in order to estimate the proper moment for launching my own push.

What did you see?

Oh, I didn’t see very much except the messages coming in to General Major Engel’s head­quarters, explaining where the infantry was fighting, and from them I could estimate when to commit my unit. It turned out I was actually at General Major Engel’s command post until 1400 on 16 December 1944.

What held you up?

There was a blown bridge out in “no man’s land,” northwest of Losheim. This bridge had been blown by the Germans in their previous retreat from this area. Another delay occurred when either corps or army ordered the division artillery to move up farther after the infantry had broken through. Since the division artillery was a horse-drawn artillery regiment, it clogged up the roads. This was a completely idiotic idea, inasmuch as the regiment did no firing. From 1400 to 1900, I went down to the bridge to regulate traffic and tried to restore order. The bridge was not ready for use until 1930, and my combat team started at 1600 hours.

How could you get through if the roads were clogged?

I ordered my vehicles to push through rapidly and to run down anything in the road ruthlessly. I finally found a detour around the bridge—a deep cut in the terrain—and reached Losheim at 1930 hours. There I received a radio message from division that the next railroad bridge could not be used, and that the engineers could not get up to it. I was told then to drive to Lanzerath, where I should meet elements of the parachute regiment of 3 Fallschirmjäger Division. This regiment had attempted to attack through the woods west of Lanzerath towards Honsfeld and had been repelled three times. I received orders to take over this regiment and to attack.

What was your objective?

Obviously Honsfeld.

Did you have any difficulty?

It was difficult to find my way out of Losheim because of the German and American mines. I lost five tanks and the same number of other armored vehicles before reaching Lanzerath at midnight.

What happened at Lanzerath?

There I had a conference with the commanding officer of the parachute regiment—an Oberst (I was at that time an Oberstleutnant). I asked him for all the information that he had on the enemy situation. His answer was that the woods were heavily fortified, and that scattered fire from prepared “pill boxes” plus mines in the road were holding up his advance. He told me that it was impossible to attack under these circumstances. I asked him if he had personally reconnoitered the American positions in the woods, and he replied that he had received the information from one of his battalion commanders. I asked the battalion commander, and he said that he had got the information from a hauptmann in his battalion. I called the hauptmann, and he averred that he had not personally seen the American advances [forces?] but it had been “reported to him.” At this point I became very angry and ordered the parachute regiment to give me one battalion, and I would lead the breakthrough.

I ordered my troops to deploy and be ready to attack at 0400 hours. After a conference at 0100 on 17 December 1944, I organized the attack as follows: two Panther tanks lead the column as the point, followed by a series of armored half-tracks and then a mixture of Panther and M4 tanks. Strangely enough, we broke through the area without firing a shot and found it completely unoccupied.

At dawn we arrived at Honsfeld and captured a large American group still asleep. In all, our booty consisted of 50 reconnaissance vehicles, including half-tracks, about eighty 2½ ton trucks, and fifteen or sixteen anti-tank guns. One kilometer northwest of Honsfeld we received some small arms fire, but this didn’t make us unhappy because although there was a slight delay, it allowed rear vehicles to close up.

How long were you delayed at this point?

About half to three-quarters of an hour, allowing the parachute elements to close up. Most of them rode up on the rear tanks of my column.

Judging by the noise to our right I concluded that 12 SS Panzer Division was advancing slower than their original schedule, so I decided to take their road.

Did you communicate this fact to division?

Throughout, we had no communication with division which meant anything. The first message that I received was at 0800 on 17 December 1944, asking me why the Leibstandarte [“Leibstandarte-SS Adolf Hitler,” honorary title given to 1 SS Panzer Division] had not gotten started.

Where did you decide to change your route?

At a small farm just on the outskirts of Honsfeld. One other thing which influenced my decision was the knowledge that an American gasoline dump probably existed at Buellingen, and we were already running low on gasoline. We drove on to Buellingen without any resistance, and there overran an American liaison plane group, destroying twelve L-5s. There was a slight delay when ground personnel at the liaison strip tried to stop us with a few machine guns.

Did you find the gasoline you were looking for?

Of course. We captured 200,000 liters in Buellingen and used fifty American prisoners to fill all of our tanks. This was a lucky break, because by the time we had reached Losheim, we had used up as much gasoline in 25 kilometers as we would normally have used in covering 50 kilometers, on account of the mountainous terrain in the Eifel.

Shortly after we captured Buellingen, the American artillery laid a barrage on the town at about 0930 on 17 December 1944, causing some casualties.

From Buellingen, we drove southwest toward Moderscheid. The only difficulty here was the road through the woods, where many of our vehicles got stuck in the mud. We surprised a very small American garrison in Moderscheid.

By now did you feel that you had achieved a clean breakthrough?

Yes, this was a clean breakthrough, and we continued with very little opposition. Every now and then a few stray jeeps would enter our main route of advance from side roads, apparently not realizing that we had penetrated that far. A short distance north of Thirimont, our tank point fired at an American convoy proceeding along the road from Malmédy to Ligneuville.

Was this still part of 99th Infantry Division (U.S.)?

No, this was a field artillery observation battalion.

What happened?

Eleven to fifteen of their trucks were destroyed, and we moved through their convoy with little difficulty and pushed into Ligneuville. We had information there was an American command post in Ligneuville, but we got there too late and only captured their lunch. This was between twelve and one o’clock on 17 December 1944. However, we met heavy resistance just outside of Ligneuville. There we encountered American tanks for the first time and lost one Panther and two other armored vehicles.

What did you estimate were the American losses at this point?

Two Shermans, one M-10 tank destroyer, a few machine guns, and a few PWs.

Pushing through Ligneuville was quite difficult for tanks, inasmuch as there were many curves in the road.

The Battle for Stavelot

Sepp Dietrich says that Sixth SS Panzer Army lost many tanks due to mechanical difficulties. Did you have any trouble along this line?

We lost only five or six tanks due to motor difficulties. In many cases the air conditioning broke down, or sometimes the brakes would not work. I hear that 12 SS Panzer Division had a lot of trouble with its tanks.

At 1600 on 17 December 1944 we reached the area of Stavelot, which was heavily defended. We could observe heavy traffic moving from Malmédy towards Stavelot, and Stavelot itself seemed clogged up completely with several hundred trucks. That night we attempted to capture Stavelot, but the terrain presented great difficulties. The only approach was the main road, and the ground to the left of the road fell very sharply, and to the right of the road rose very sharply. There was a short curve just at the entrance to Stavelot where several Sherman tanks and anti-tank guns were zeroed in.

Thereupon, we shelled Stavelot with heavy infantry howitzers and mortars, resulting in great confusion within the town and the destruction of several dumps.

At the same time, I ordered one of my Mark IV tank companies to try to find a way around Stavelot through Aisomont, Wanne, and Trois Ponts. It proceeded along a small trail which was nearly impossible to negotiate with tanks. At 1800 a counterattack circled around a high hill 800 meters east of Stavelot and hit my column from the south.

Were any tanks included in this counterattack?

No, the terrain was much too difficult, and the counterattack consisted entirely of infantry. After the counterattack was repulsed, I committed more armored infantry to attack Stavelot again. We approached the outskirts of the village but bogged down because of stubborn American resistance at the edge of Stavelot. We suffered fairly heavy losses, twenty-five to thirty casualties, from tank, anti-tank, mortar, and rifle fire. Since I did not have sufficient infantry, I decided to wait for the arrival of more infantry.

Where did you expect to get this infantry?

I had one battalion of armored infantry in my column.

As darkness fell, we observed heavy American traffic all moving westward, without blackout restrictions. We fired at them up to a range of 4,800 yards with our tanks but launched no additional organized counterattacks until dawn of 18 December 1944. At dawn, I committed another armored infantry company against Stavelot. I withdrew two Panther tanks 200 meters from the edge of the town and instructed them to charge Stavelot at maximum speed. They drove around the curve firing rapidly. The first Panther tank was hit, and it burned, but it had so much initial speed that it penetrated the anti-tank obstacle at the curve and damaged two Sherman tanks. The second Panther used this opportunity to drive through and seize a bridge in Stavelot. We followed up with other vehicles, and the Americans evacuated the town, leaving some materiel.

How much?

Oh, I didn’t see it.

Efforts to Continue the Advance

Where did you go?

We proceeded at top speed towards Trois Ponts in an effort to seize the bridge there. We were delayed briefly by an anti-tank gun east of the bridge. We destroyed the anti-tank gun, but then the enemy blew up the bridge in our faces.

What was the importance of the bridge in Trois Ponts; in other words, what do you think you might have been able to do if you captured the bridge intact?

If we had captured the bridge at Trois Ponts intact and had had enough fuel, it would have been a simple matter to drive through to the Meuse River early that day.

Blocked at Trois Ponts, we continued on to La Gleize where we encountered little resistance. There was another important bridge near Cheneux, which we prevented from being blown. However, in the afternoon of 18 December 1944 we had a bad break when the weather cleared and American fighter-bombers came over. We lost two to three tanks and five armored half-tracks. The tanks blew up in the road, and the road was too narrow to bypass them, thus causing additional delay. About 1800 on 18 December 1944 we moved up towards our old route of advance near Habiemont and started to cross the Lienne River. Just when we were starting to cross, this bridge also was blown up. I sent one of my tank companies on a recon­nais­sance mission to find another bridge north of this point. Elements advanced over a newly dis­covered bridge and then were ambushed and suffered heavy casualties. It was then reported that the bridge was not heavy enough for our tanks. Not being able to find another bridge, it was decided to turn north to Stoumont and La Gleize. After reaching La Gleize, another group reconnoitered towards Stoumont. It was reported that Stoumont was strongly held and that powerful American forces were moving from Spa towards Stoumont.

Failure of the Offensive

Did you observe any difference in quality of American troops in this sector?

Decidedly. We were now confronting elements of your 30th Infantry Division and 82nd Airborne Division, who fought far more savagely than 99th Infantry Division (U.S.). We decided to hold the bridge southwest of La Gleize, since it might prove important later on, and to attack Stoumont. At daylight on 19 December 1944, we attacked Stoumont with one battalion of armored infantry and one company of parachutists attacking on both sides of the road, supported by tank fire. Again because of the terrain, tanks were unable to leave the road. Strong fire from Stoumont and heavy flanking fire from the north from your 30th Infantry Division checked our attempts to enter Stoumont. However, we used the same technique of sending in two to three tanks at maximum speed, and eventually broke into and cleared out the village, and then pushed westward to seize a bridge west of Stoumont. This was about as much as we could do with the gasoline that we had.

From then on, events turned rapidly against us. The same day, the commanding officer of the reconnaissance battalion reported that Stavelot had been retaken. As our infantry had been pushed to the eastern edge of the town, I immediately ordered him to attack from the west and clear Stavelot.

On 19 December 1944 three counterattacks launched at Stoumont were repelled. However, we began to realize that we had insufficient gasoline to cross the bridge west of Stoumont. Therefore, we ordered the forces west of Stoumont to withdraw to the town.

On 20 December 1944 we tried to attack again, with little success. American troops attacked us from northeast of La Gleize and at the same time attacked Cheneux, where we had left a group to protect the bridge. Realizing that we were weak at La Gleize, Stoumont and Cheneux, and endangered at all three points, we decided to abandon Stoumont that night. A small counterattack covered our withdrawal from Stoumont. After Cheneux had been captured and recaptured twice, we abandoned it and retreated to La Gleize on the night of 20 December 1944.

What were the orders that you received from division headquarters during this period?

[Obst. Peiper sniffed cynically.] I got one message that I should report immediately the location of my dressing stations for the wounded, and that unless I reported the amount of gas I still had on hand, I could not hope for any additional gasoline.

Were you able to maintain radio contact and inform division of your whereabouts?

We had no regular radio contact with division, but division knew of our whereabouts by listening in to the American radios.

What indication did you get that the entire Ardennes Offensive had failed in a larger sense?

The first indication we had was a message on 23 December 1944 at 1700 ordering us to break out toward the east with our vehicles and men. When I received that message I realized that the only chance was to break out without any vehicles and wounded. Accordingly on 24 December 1944, at 0100, we abandoned all our vehicles and started walking back.

What were your losses?

We had to leave over three hundred in La Gleize, and they were probably captured. Only eight hundred men got out.

If you had to launch this offensive again, what measures would you execute differently, both in the higher planning and within your own regiment?

It soon became apparent that the real aim of the Ardennes Offensive was not to reach Antwerp, but simply to disturb American preparations and delay the American winter offensive for two months. This should have been made clear by the higher command at the start of the counteroffensive. There are certain definite things that I would do differently:

Institute a speedier system of supplying gasoline.

Have no artillery preparation and keep the horse-drawn artillery from clogging the roads.

Attack with combat teams and tanks at the same time as the infantry. An unsupported infantry attack wastes too much time.

Reduce the length of each column, and instead of three columns use twenty; then upon finding the softest spot, all columns should concentrate on this point.

Use more infantry on tanks.

Take along a bridging unit with each armored point.

Make each combat team completely self-sufficient.

Put a general at each street corner to regulate traffic. [Obst. Peiper indicated that there were two good reasons for such a move, and one of them was not traffic control.]

  

He Built a Better Mousetrap: Gerd Von Rundstedt and the Ardennes Offensive

Gerd von Rundstedt photographed as a Reichswehr general in the early 1930s, wearing the stand-and-fall gray collar of the period.
 

The trap had been prepared months before. The idea for the massive German counteroffensive in the Ardennes was first broached during the summer of 1944. “The Great Blow,” was how the German high command referred to the operation during its planning stages.

“The counteroffensive will be the great blow against the Allies,” Hitler told his generals. “The assault will drive the Americans and English back to the sea…”

Gerd von Rundstedt was the man who would serve as the genius of the “Great Blow.” A German general of the old school, a monocled, aristocratic Junker, von Rundstedt was an ideal choice for the task.

War was his sole interest—his entire life. He was one of those whose entire career was concerned exclusively with military matters. Gerd von Rundstedt considered warfare a cold, exact science. He could be relied upon to plan the huge campaign down to the last and tiniest detail.

There were other reasons why he was chosen. Main among these was the fact that he was popular with officers and men of the battered Wehrmacht. The grim-visaged, ramrod-straight general had earned and maintained the respect not only of the “regulars,” but even of the | troops who normally resented old-line regular Army commanders.

Dwight D. Eisenhower, the man who would be von Rundstedt’s opposite number, once the offensive began, was an individual of a far different stamp. Smiling and friendly, he was the typical product of the happy-go-lucky American civilization. Almost a genius at the horrendous task of getting the opposing personalities of a Grand Alliance to work together, his greatest strength was organization rather than strategy.

Eisenhower, though trained in the regular professional military tradition, preferred to depend heavily on staff analysis. A carry-outer rather than a thinker-upper, he failed to react swiftly enough when the chips were down, some said, and this might have caused a disastrous lapse.

Luckily for the Allied cause, the echelon immediately below him—Bradley, Patton and Montgomery—reacted by instinct. And that instinct helped save the battle.

And to make it even worse, Ike had been through it all before. In Africa, during the early days of fighting, he had committed raw, unblooded troops against veterans. At Kasserine Pass, he had walked into an almost identical trap. There, the British Eighth Army, advancing with hysterical speed from the south had saved his army. And the official scapegoat, Fredenhall, had saved his name.

The tense, critical days of the Ardennes battle—and the retrospective judgment of history—show that von Rundstedt was the best man for the job at hand. It was not von Rundstedt’s planning or his leadership that caused the failure of the drive. The campaign failed for other reasons.

Nor can it be truthfully said that American command or staff work turned the tide.

Actually, Gerd von Rundstedt succeeded in thoroughly out-thinking and surprising the Allied Supreme Commander. In short, he constructed an intricate, elaborate mousetrap—and succeeded in drawing “Ike” Eisenhower into it!

How the German Army managed to accomplish its incredible degree of total surprise and early victories is one of the great wonders of World War II.

In order to launch the offensive, it was necessary for von Rundstedt and Feldmarschall Walter Model, commander of German Army Group B to move—and to concentrate—tremendous numbers of men and quantities of materiel in a relatively small area.

On the opening day of the offensive alone, von Rundstedt’s plan called for hurling seventeen divisions—over 200,000 soldiers—against a narrow sector of the American line!

Behind this huge striking force—ready to move up and consolidate early gains—would stand more than a dozen reserve divisions. This tremendous mass of men was organized into three field armies—the Sixth Panzer under Dietrich, the Fifth Panzer under Manteuffel, and the Seventh Army commanded by Brandenberger.

Needless to say, it was a tremendous task to amass the tanks, guns, ammunition and supplies necessary for this force. Military analysts find their credulity sorely tested by the grim fact that neither Allied air reconnaissance nor Allied intelligence ever suspected that anything new or different was afoot.

To make matters ever more unbelievable, certain preliminary orders issued by the German High Command in preparation for the offensive actually fell into the hands of Allied intelligence. As early as October and November 1944, G-2 sections at various levels were in possession of German communications which gave ample warning of the forthcoming build-up and attack. Yet absolutely nothing was done with this information—it was not even relayed to field units. And so it happened…

The Allied armies had pulled up after a swift race across France. A halt was considered necessary to permit logistics and communications to catch up to the combat troops. Part of the Allied line ran through the Ardennes forest region of Belgium.

Unmindful—or rather unaware—of the German buildup taking place behind the enemy’s lines, the American command had few troops in the sector extending from Luxembourg in the south to St. Vith in the north.

Holding positions along the Schnee Eifel, a commanding hill-mass east of St. Vith, was the green, untried 106th Infantry Division. That unit plus the 4th and 28th Divisions and two combat commands of the 9th Armored Division, were the only outfits holding a line against which von Rundstedt would throw no less than eleven divisions in the first hours of the battle.

The German leaders had worked a miracle. Despite incessant Allied air raids against the Reich and its industry, they had collected nearly five thousand aircraft to use in the offensive. In addition to the new planes, among them Me 262 jets, the German war machine in the West had been equipped with new tanks and artillery pieces in large numbers.

All this equipment had been brought to the front under the very eyes of Allied air reconnaissance. For weeks, German roads leading to the front had been clogged with guns and vehicles. Some of the convoys had been spotted, true enough, and bombed and strafed. Yet, the majority got through.

“One of our biggest troubles was the air of wild optimism that pervaded SHAEF headquarters,” is the off-the-record admission of a retired American general. “We’d sliced across France and the top brass figured that Germany was licked. Anyone suggesting that the Germans had enough strength left to launch a counteroffensive would have been hooted down in the officers mess!”

There were some combat commanders who suspected something was up. Veteran front-line officers sensed there was something in the wind. Mainly on their own initiative, many of them ordered their fuel and supply drums moved far back behind the forward positions—one of the strokes that eventually contributed to the German defeat.

The attack that came on 16 December nonetheless caught the American Army flat-footed.

The assault went off like clock-work—exactly as Gerd von Rund­stedt had planned it. General Hasso von Manteuffel’s Fifth Panzer Army slammed into the unblooded 106th Division. The 106th went to pieces.

Observers even then found it difficult to understand why such a raw unit—the 106th had only recently arrived from the States—had been assigned a key holding position. The result of an attack against the division should have been a foregone conclusion.

In experience, men and officers were no match for Hitler’s hardened veterans. The 106th broke—and large segments of it ran—and two regiments, the 422nd and 423rd, were all but completely wiped out.

To the south of the 106th, two entire German corps struck the “Bloody Bucket” 28th Division—which was holding more than twenty-seven miles of the front.

Evidently, the heady perfume of victorious optimism still clogged the nostrils of the brass at SHAEF. Although seventeen Ger­man divisions had been committed in the opening stages of the battle, the reports from the front were shrugged off by SHAEF intelligence sections.

“Just a local diversion,” one top-level SHAEF G-2 officer decided.

Gerd von Rundstedt’s reports were received with jubilation in Berlin.

“I told the Führer on the first day of attack that surprise had been completely achieved,” Colonel General Alfred Jodl stated after the war. “The best indication was that no reinforcements were made in your sector before the attack.”

The German drive overwhelmed the thinly-spread American defense forces in the Ardennes. The line was pushed back. Regiments and divisions, out-numbered and out-gunned, were forced to fall back. For more than forty-eight hours, SHAEF seemed in a state of paralysis.

Fearful rumors spread and what had been optimism turned to gloom—and then to a state almost bordering on hysteria. Even ranking officers were carried away by the wave of defeatism that swept the rear areas.

“The Germans are unbeatable…”

“We’ll be licked…”

“They’ll have us fighting with our backs to the sea…”

First the German strength and potential had been under-estimated. Now, it was over-estimated.

Despite the showing it was making in the Ardennes, the slender resources of the Wehr­macht had been stretched beyond the breaking point. Fuel—for ground vehicles and aircraft—was the most serious shortage.

One of the most vital points in von Rundstedt’s planning called for swift movement—blitz thrusts through the American line—for the purpose of capturing U.S. fuel and oil dumps. Without this, he knew the drive could not be sustained. The panzer divisions had gasoline for only a few days—there were no reserves of gas left in Germany.

It is here that the foresight—almost bordering on occult perception—of the American field commanders paid off. Their action in moving their supply dumps to the rear denied the critically needed gasoline to the Germans.

The Battle of the Bulge was fought at the divisional, regimental, battalion and company levels. In the confusion and chaos that followed the first day, the courage and determination of front-line units saved the situation, rather than any “Big-Picture” strategic or tactical moves or decisions emanating from SHAEF.

Fierce defensive actions were fought at St. Vith by Brigadier General Bruce Clarke and his Combat Command B of the 7th Armored Division and at Bastogne, where airborne troopers were completely surrounded and cutoff.

These stands, as well as others, slowed the German drive and ruined von Rundstedt’s carefully planned timetable. The delaying actions were essential—for it was not until 22 December that George Patton’s Third Army brought the full weight of its counter-punch against the south side of the Bulge. It was also about that time that the weather cleared enough for Allied air to resume large-scale operations.

Patton’s attack and the resumption of air assaults sealed the fate of von Rundstedt’s offensive, but it was not until mid-January that the Allies were able to start a drive to recapture lost ground.

There is an old saw among military men to the effect that one side’s strategical success is automatically the other’s strategical blunder. If this were accepted at face value, then the Battle of the Bulge would be a textbook example to illustrate the theory.

Using the opposing commanders—von Rundstedt and Eisenhower—as the representative single symbols of the two armies which faced each other in the Ardennes, one must arrive at an inescapable conclusion.

The German general clearly achieved all the elements of strategic superiority. Through his planning and command, entire corps and fantastic masses of weapons and equipment were brought to a front-line sector from widely-separated areas without serious hitch and, more importantly, without the knowledge of the Allies.

The assault was a complete surprise. Conceived as a last-ditch measure, the counteroffensive was brilliantly executed and stood an excellent chance of succeeding up to the very last.

General Dwight Eisenhower’s intelligence service was faulty to the point of being virtually worthless in the period before and during the early stages of the battle. SHAEF G-2 was completely in the dark about German intentions—and grossly miscalculated enemy intentions and strength in the opening days of the Ardennes conflict.

In addition, it would almost appear that Eisenhower’s staff was unnerved by the implications of the Bulge. Starting with such decisions as those placing the unreliable 106th Division in a vital position and which spread divisions like the 28th over great stretches of front, SHAEF staff-work does not stand up under close scrutiny.

Decisions to shift other units to the Bulge to throw back the Germans seemed slow in coming. Several days elapsed before the full implication of the drive was realized and sufficient force diverted from other sectors to plug the gaps.

The coldly calculated offensive engineered by Gerd von Rundstedt, the stern-visaged Prussian, ended in defeat. It nearly ended differently, however. For von Rundstedt had built a trap—an excellent trap—and he had enticed Eisenhower into it.

Luckily for the Allies, although Ike walked into the trap, he had enough power and punch to fight his way out eventually. Otherwise, the story of World War II might have had an entirely different ending…

 

Hitler and von Rundstedt examining a situation map. 

 

Generalfeldmarschall von Rundstedt and high-ranking Wehrmacht and SS officers inspecting shock troops of the 6th SS Panzer Army. The camouflage of this Sd.Kfz. 251 half-track consists of dark gray with sand and brown/green lines and mottle sprayed on top.