Viewing Photographs

Many of the images used in this blog are larger than they are reproduced in the article posts. Click on any image and a list of thumbnails will be displayed and clicking on a thumbnail will display that image in its original size.

Aerial Combat Tactics

by Colonel Raymond F. Toliver, U.S. Air Force (Retired)

It has been said that aerial combat is the only remaining glamorous and chivalrous activity in warfare. Of course, this is not exactly true, but aerial combat does continue to captivate the imagination, perhaps to an extent far beyond its real importance. Air superiority is of para-mount importance in warfare, but actual air-to-air combat is only one of the factors involved in gaining and maintaining aerial superiority.

This work, however, deals with aerial combat tactics, and not with the multitude of other factors involved in air superiority. Therefore, with this nod of recognition to those “other factors,” we’ll push them over to the side and start the “bounce” on the target we are about to engage.

The nearest approximation to aerial combat is, in my opinion, auto racing. Flying the fighter airplane can be compared to driving the high-speed racer. Getting the fighter off the ground, around the pattern, and safely back to home plate, is about like driving the racer around the track at, say, 100 miles per hour. The similarity does not end there, however.

Add some more racers onto the track, and see who can get around first. Now you’ve added the element of competition, and it’s much like joining combat, like the so-called “dogfight” training. In an actual situation though, the similarity to auto racing ends, because the addition of missiles, machine guns, and the threat of mid-air collision makes the final outcome much more permanent and fearsome. The glamour of flying fighters quickly dissipates when a pilot sees an enemy missile or tracers whistling by within inches. “Sonofabitch! That guy’s shooting at me. A guy can get hurt in this game!” From that point in time, a fighter pilot forgets the glamour, and suddenly realizes how poorly trained he really is to cope with such a situation. Once he survives this first encounter, the pilot takes immediate interest in air tactics, becoming a highly motivated student of the art. His life is at stake and he knows it!

Going back to World War II, why should a pilot have waited to learn tactics until after he had been through his first combat? A number of factors created this situation, stemming from our World War I experiences, which were few, and only enough to convince our leaders that aerial combat was a dogfight, and that Americans, through our manifest destiny, I suppose, would always prevail. Furthermore, between the wars the United States developed the self-defending bomber—fast, agile and sturdy, so that, in their thinking, fighter-to-fighter combat was born, lived and died in World War I or shortly thereafter. General H. H. Arnold, our AAF leader in World War II, had been the proponent of the bomber between the wars.

It did not prove out that way in World War II, and it still has not worked out that way, even with the benefit of World War II, Korea, and Vietnam experiences. When enemy fighters show up, the bombers need fighters along to protect them.

But in 1941 through 1945 our pilots went to war with a lot of touch and go landings, a bit of formation flying, a smattering of air-to-ground gunnery, and a slight knowledge of the English “Vic” combat formation. The only other combat training was a small amount of “dogfighting.” That is defined as a rat race wherein you attempt to fly your airplane to a spot close behind your opponent, in his six o’clock position, and stay there. Of course, he tries the same thing and keeps you from accomplishing your goal.

There is nothing more terrifying than for a pilot to discover that an enemy fighter has gained the dominant position! Panic wells up—unjokingly referred to as a very high pucker factor—into your throat and before your very eyes. In fact, the reason we hear so little about it is that very few survived the ordeal.

The British, using their “Vic” of three airplanes system found that this formation degraded their maneuverability (although it increased their firepower) so they tried a three- and four-airplane in rail, echelon up or down formation. In this there was no one in a position to look behind tail-end Charlie, and the result was a very high mortality rate for anyone in that slot.

After much analysis, the RAF rather reluctantly followed the German lead, and switched to the “fluid-four” or “finger-four” flight, which had been developed during the Spanish Civil War. The finger-four is best illustrated if you hold your fingers of one hand out straight. The finger tips denote the relative positions of the fighter aircraft. The RAF taught this system to the U.S. Army Air Corps.

World War II had many versions of the “finger-four” or “fluid-four” attack system. The Germans, the Americans, the English and the Japanese all had varied applications. The Soviets were slow to adapt to it but after 1943 they, too, had recognized the advantage therein, and the Luftwaffe then had to work much harder for their kills.

When, in 1939 and 1940, against English Spitfire and Hurricane opposition, the Germans realized that they could not continue to accept the losses they were experiencing, Galland and Mölders put their thinking processes to work. The Me 109 (Bf 109) was faster and could climb faster, too, yet the Spitfires were chewing them up. So the Luftwaffe went to hit and run tactics, using the “finger-four” formations to perfection. This reversed the loss rate … but the Battle of Britain was over, and on 21 June 1941, they were all on the Eastern Front taking on another enemy.

Against the Soviets, the Luftwaffe pilots applied all the knowledge and experience they had gained on the Western Front. The “finger-four” worked beautifully, and hundreds of MiGs, Yaks and Ilyushins splattered to the ground. The Soviet “Stormovik” proved to be the hardest nut to crack. Flying below 3,000 feet, and sometimes just above the ground, protected by thick armor plate, the Il-2 came near being the enigma of the Luftwaffe. However, it wasn’t long before the German pilots discovered that the best tactic was to get close behind and below the Il-2, and shoot up the oil cooling radiator. Once this was hit, the Il-2 was a cripple that would soon have to land, usually with a dead engine. The wooden propeller of the Il-2 was also vulnerable, but the machine gained the reputation of being a flying tank.

Against the Japanese, after Pearl Harbor, we Americans experienced the Me 109/Spitfire dilemma, as the English and Germans had. Our P-40s were faster but less maneuverable, while the Zeros were slower but very maneuverable. We suffered some losses before General Claire Chennault, the U.S. Army Air Corps champion of fighter tactics between the wars (and later head of the original Flying Tigers) decided that hit and run was the only answer to the Zero. This tactic changed the air battle around. The Japanese began to lose Zeros at an alarming rate and this never stopped until the war’s end in 1945.

A fairly accurate guesstimate, as good as anyone else’s anyway, is that about eighty per cent of the pilots/aircraft shot down in World War II aerial combat, never saw their conqueror. It was the same in World War I, in Korea, and no doubt applied in Vietnam. Therefore we can safely assume that the best combat tactic is to pussyfoot unseen upon your enemy, establish yourself and your gun platform in the correct place behind your quarry, and fire away at the target before he sees you and takes evasive action.

There are two points to remember, however. Be sure to shoot straight and hit him, because at the precise moment of firing, your opponent will suddenly realize you’re there, and you’ll have a real tiger by the tail beginning then! The other thing to remember is that your enemy will have had a buddy someplace nearby, and if you quickly check behind you at the six o’clock position, you’ll probably find him closing rapidly. So you have only a split second to fire and break away. This is where six .50-caliber guns with their inherit rapid rates of fire, come in handy.

That takes care of the eighty per cent (or plus) of aerial kills. It’s the other twenty per cent that come harder. Factors which influence decisions in these cases include the sun position, altitude, turning ability, dive speeds and differential excess power factors (you must know the areas in the flight envelope of your fighter wherein you have advantages in turn or speed over your opponent, and how much, etc.). Also, you must consider whether you want to get into a turning dogfight or not, and if you do, can you hack a one-on-one fight? You’ll always lose your wingman after the initial bounce and turn, so be prepared to go it alone until you get released by your opponent, and can get back to the stipulated rendezvous point. Most of the turning fights in World War II ended up as draws, and those that didn’t often ended up with the superior pilot being shot down … he was winning against one enemy airplane, but the enemy’s buddy was there, too, and forgotten for just a moment.

Let me give you an example: Günther Rall, the third-ranking ace of World War II (275 aerial victories), was probably the best in a dogfight of all German fighter aces. He had one major deficiency, though, which allowed Erich Hartmann (352 victories) and Gerhard Barkhorn (301 victories) to surpass him in total kills. Rall was a great competitor and honestly believed he was the world’s greatest fighter pilot. He would have proven that a fact had he not spent so much time in hospitals after being seriously wounded on three of the many times he was shot down. Although he was in the war for over five years, he was only able to fly for about two years, due to a broken back and other wounds. The risk of exposure to injury, death, or just being shot down is probably ten to fifty times higher in a dogfight than it is in a high-speed one-pass hit and run bounce.

In conclusion, only a pilot who has been in aerial combat knows that terrible feeling of panic when he suddenly realizes that his enemy has gained the dominant position, and has him boresighted. It is a panic which jumbles the thinking processes completely, and he who can regain control will, most likely, do the right thing and live to fight another day.



 
The Thach Weave.

Tactical formations for Japanese Navy fighters.

Rule number five in Dicta Boelcke, a set of rules laid down by First World War flying ace Oswald Boelcke, says that “In any form of attack it is essential to assail your enemy from behind.” In other words, sneak up behind your opponent and blow him out of the sky before he has a chance to react.

Fighter plane contrails mark the sky over Task Force 58, during the "Great Marianas Turkey Shoot" phase of the battle, 19 June 1944. Photographed from on board USS Birmingham (CL-62). (Battle of the Philippine Sea, June 1944.)

German propaganda photo purporting to show a Spitfire I flying very close to a Dornier 17Z. The inboard position of the upper wing roundels on the Spitfire strongly suggests this was a repainted captured Spitfire or a photo-reconnaissance model, at least one of which was captured in France.

Pattern of condensation trails left by British and German aircraft after a dogfight during the Battle of Britain, 18 September 1940.

A still from camera gun film shows tracer ammunition from a Supermarine Spitfire Mark I of No. 609 Squadron RAF, flown by Flight Lieutenant J. H. G. McArthur, hitting a Heinkel He 111 on its starboard quarter. These aircraft were part of a large formation from KG 53 and KG 55 which attacked the Bristol Aeroplane Company's works at Filton, Bristol, just before midday on 25 September 1940. No. 609 Squadron were based at Middle Wallop, Hampshire.

A Navy Hellcat toting a drop tank shoots down a Mitsubishi A6M Zero. The term “dogfight” was first used in World War I. In the century plus since airplanes first took to the skies to do combat, the term “dissimilar aircraft maneuvering” or DACM, “hassling,” “furball” and “three-dimensional knife fight” have all been used to define a battle between two or more flying machines.

U.S. Army Air Force Curtiss P-40F Warhawk fighters on a training flight out of Moore Field, near Mission, Texas, in 1943. The lead aircraft in a formation of P-40s is peeling off for an "attack" in a practice flight at the Army Air Forces advanced flying school. Selected aviation cadets were given transition training in these fighter planes before receiving their pilot's wings.

A B-25 Mitchell bomber being pursued by an A6M3 Zero, in a mock simulation of combat during the 2012 Arctic Thunder Air Show, at Elmendorf Air Force Base, 30 July 2012.

This is a picture tracking bullet holes on Allied planes that encountered German anti-aircraft fire in World War II. At first, the military wanted to reinforce those areas, because obviously that's where the ground crews observed the most damage on returning planes. Until Hungarian-born Jewish mathematician Abraham Wald pointed out that this was the damage on the planes that made it home, and the Allies should armor the areas where there are no dots at all, because those are the places where the planes won't survive when hit. This phenomenon is called survivorship bias, a logic error where you focus on things that survived when you should really be looking at things that didn't.

Tactical formations for Japanese Navy fighters.

Finger-four squadron formation.

Tactical formations for Japanese Navy fighters.

The basic Thach Weave, executed by two wingmen. To defeat the Thach weave, the Japanese pilots had to avoid the temptation of chasing the enemy into the weave and getting shot by the wingman. Instead, they had to maneuver to turn to shoot instead at the American wingman or twist away to snipe at the enemy on the sides or turn so that they can shoot at the Americans as they crisscrossed with each other. They had to have tremendous situational awareness and not be target fixated.

A P-47 Thunderbolt in combat with a German Me 110.

Lt. Comdr "Jimmy" John S. Thach. Thach had developed a beam weave tactic before the Pearl Harbor raid when he read USN Intelligence reports on the Zero, developing the tactic months before American fighter pilots encountered the Zero. It was a beam defensive tactic. It involved two fighter planes doing a weave loop and enabling their team mate to shoot at the pursuing enemy (if the enemy unwisely pursued).

Japanese fighter tactics against B-29s.

Deflection table.

Vic squadron formation.

Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto, Japanese Navy

Isoroku Yamamoto (April 4, 1884 – April 18, 1943) was a Japanese Marshal Admiral and the commander-in-chief of the Combined Fleet during World War II until his death.

Yamamoto held several important posts in the Imperial Japanese Navy, and undertook many of its changes and reorganizations, especially its development of naval aviation. He was the commander-in-chief during the decisive early years of the Pacific War and so was responsible for major battles such as Pearl Harbor and Midway. He died when American codebreakers identified his flight plans and his plane was shot down. His death was a major blow to Japanese military morale during World War II.

Yamamoto was born Isoroku Takano in Nagaoka, Niigata. His father was Sadayoshi Takano, an intermediate-rank samurai of the Nagaoka Domain. “Isoroku” is an old Japanese term meaning “56”; the name referred to his father’s age at Isoroku’s birth.

In 1916, Isoroku was adopted into the Yamamoto family (another family of former Nagaoka samurai) and took the Yamamoto name. It was a common practice for samurai families lacking sons to adopt suitable young men in this fashion to carry on the family name, the rank and the income that comes with it. In 1918 Isoroku married Reiko Mihashi, with whom he had two sons and two daughters.

After graduating from the Imperial Japanese Naval Academy in 1904, Yamamoto served on the armored cruiser Nisshin during the Russo-Japanese War. He was wounded at the Battle of Tsushima, losing two fingers (the index and middle fingers) on his left hand, as the cruiser was hit repeatedly by the Russian battleline. He returned to the Naval Staff College in 1914, emerging as a Lieutenant Commander in 1916.

Yamamoto was part of the Japanese Navy establishment, who were rivals of the more aggressive Army establishment, especially the officers of the Kwantung Army. As such he promoted a policy of a strong fleet to project force through gunboat diplomacy, rather than a fleet used primarily for transport of invasion land forces, as some of his political opponents in the army wanted. This stance led him to oppose the invasion of China. He also opposed war against the United States partly because of his studies at Harvard University (1919–1921) and his two postings as a naval attaché in Washington, D.C. He learned to speak fluent English as a result. Yamamoto traveled extensively in the United States during his tour of duty there, where he studied American customs and business practices.

He was promoted to Captain in 1923. On April 13, 1924 at the rank of captain, he was part of the Japanese delegation visiting the U.S. Naval War College. Later that year, he changed his specialty from gunnery to naval aviation. His first command was the cruiser Isuzu in 1928, followed by the aircraft carrier Akagi.

He participated in the second London Naval Conference of 1930 as a Rear Admiral and the 1934 London Naval Conference as a Vice Admiral, as the growing military influence on the government at the time deemed that a career military specialist needed to accompany the diplomats to the arms limitations talks. Yamamoto was a strong proponent of naval aviation, and served as head of the Aeronautics Department before accepting a post as commander of the First Carrier Division. Yamamoto personally opposed the invasion of Manchuria in 1931, the subsequent land war with China (1937), and the 1940 Tripartite Pact with Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy. As Deputy Navy Minister, he apologized to United States Ambassador Joseph C. Grew for the bombing of the gunboat USS Panay in December 1937. These issues made him a target of assassination threats by pro-war militarists.

Throughout 1938, many young army and naval officers began to speak publicly against Yamamoto and certain other Japanese admirals such as Mitsumasa Yonai and Shigeyoshi Inoue for their strong opposition towards a Tripartite pact with Nazi Germany for reportedly being against “Japan’s natural interests.” Yamamoto himself received a steady stream of hate mail and death threats from Japanese nationalists but his reaction to the prospect of death by assassination was passive and accepting. The Admiral wrote:

To die for Emperor and Nation is the highest hope of a military man. After a brave hard fight the blossoms are scattered on the fighting field. But if a person wants to take a life instead, still the fighting man will go to eternity for Emperor and country. One man’s life or death is a matter of no importance. All that matters is the Empire. As Confucius said, “They may crush cinnabar, yet they do not take away its color; one may burn a fragrant herb, yet it will not destroy the scent.” They may destroy my body, yet they will not take away my will.

The Japanese army, annoyed at Yamamoto’s unflinching opposition to a Rome-Berlin-Tokyo treaty, dispatched military police to “guard” Yamamoto; this was an attempt by the Army to keep an eye on him. He was later reassigned from the Navy Ministry to sea as the Commander-in-Chief of the Combined Fleet on (August 30, 1939). This was done as one of the last acts of the then-acting Navy Minister Mitsumasa Yonai, under Baron Hiranuma’s short-lived administration partly to make it harder for assassins to target Yamamoto; Yonai was certain that if Yamamoto remained ashore, he would be killed before the year (1939) ended.

Yamamoto was promoted to Admiral on November 15, 1940. This, in spite of the fact that when Hideki Tōjō was appointed Prime Minister on October 18, 1941, many political observers thought that Yamamoto’s career was essentially over. Tōjō had been Yamamoto’s old opponent from the time when the latter served as Japan’s deputy navy minister and Tōjō was the prime mover behind Japan’s takeover of Manchuria. It was believed that Yamamoto would be appointed to command the Yokosuka Naval Base, “a nice safe demotion with a big house and no power at all.” After the new Japanese cabinet was announced, however, Yamamoto found himself left alone in his position despite his open conflicts with Tōjō and other members of the army’s oligarchy who favored war with the European powers and America. Two of the main reasons for Yamamoto’s political survival were his immense popularity within the fleet, where he commanded the respect of his men and officers, and his close relations with the imperial family. He also had the acceptance by Japan’s naval hierarchy:

There was no officer more competent to lead the Combined Fleet to victory than Admiral Yamamoto. His daring plan for the Pearl Harbor attack had passed through the crucible of the Japanese naval establishment, and after many expressed misgivings, his fellow admirals had realized that Yamamoto spoke no more than the truth when he said that Japan’s hope for victory in this [upcoming] war was limited by time and oil. Every sensible officer of the navy was well aware of the perennial oil problems. Also, it had to be recognized that if the enemy could seriously disturb Japanese merchant shipping, then the fleet would be endangered even more.

Consequently, Yamamoto stayed in his post. With Tōjō now in charge of Japan’s highest political office, it became clear the army would lead the navy into a war about which Yamamoto had serious reservations. He wrote to an ultranationalist:

Should hostilities once break out between Japan and the United States, it would not be enough that we take Guam and the Philippines, nor even Hawaii and San Francisco. To make victory certain, we would have to march into Washington and dictate the terms of peace in the White House. I wonder if our politicians (who speak so lightly of a Japanese-American war) have confidence as to the final outcome and are prepared to make the necessary sacrifices.

This quote was spread by the militarists, minus the last sentence, where it was interpreted in America as a boast that Japan would conquer the entire continental United States. The omitted sentence showed Yamamoto’s counsel of caution towards a war that could cost Japan dearly. Nevertheless, Yamamoto accepted the reality of impending war and planned for a quick victory by destroying the US fleet at Pearl Harbor in a preventive strike while simultaneously thrusting into the oil and rubber resource rich areas of Southeast Asia, especially the Dutch East Indies, Borneo and Malaya. In naval matters, Yamamoto opposed the building of the super-battleships Yamato and Musashi as an unwise investment of resources.

Yamamoto was responsible for a number of innovations in Japanese naval aviation. Although remembered for his association with aircraft carriers due to Pearl Harbor and Midway, Yamamoto did more to influence the development of land-based naval aviation, particularly the Mitsubishi G3M and G4M medium bombers. His demand for great range and the ability to carry a torpedo was intended to conform to Japanese conceptions of attriting the American fleet as it advanced across the Pacific in war. The planes did achieve long range, but long-range fighter escorts were not available. These planes were lightly constructed and when fully fueled, they were especially vulnerable to enemy fire. This earned the G4M the sardonic nickname “the Flying Cigarette Lighter.” Yamamoto would eventually die in one of these aircraft.

The range of the G3M and G4M contributed to a demand for great range in a fighter aircraft. This partly drove the requirements for the A6M Zero which was as noteworthy for its range as for its maneuverability. Both qualities were again purchased at the expense of light construction and flammability that later contributed to the A6M’s high casualty rates as the war progressed.

As Japan moved toward war during 1940, Yamamoto gradually moved toward strategic as well as tactical innovation, again with mixed results. Prompted by talented young officers such as Lieutenant Commander Minoru Genda, Yamamoto approved the reorganization of Japanese carrier forces into the First Air Fleet, a consolidated striking force that gathered Japan’s six largest carriers into one unit. This innovation gave great striking capacity, but also concentrated the vulnerable carriers into a compact target; both boon and bane would be realized in war. Yamamoto also oversaw the organization of a similar large land-based organization in the 11th Air Fleet, which would later use the G3M and G4M to neutralize American air forces in the Philippines and sink the British Force “Z.”

In January 1941, Yamamoto went even further and proposed a radical revision of Japanese naval strategy. For two decades, in keeping with the doctrine of Captain Alfred T. Mahan, the Naval General Staff had planned in terms of Japanese light surface forces, submarines and land-based air units whittling down the American Fleet as it advanced across the Pacific until the Japanese Navy engaged it in a climactic “Decisive Battle” in the northern Philippine Sea (between the Ryukyu Islands and the Marianas Islands), with battleships meeting in the traditional exchange between battle lines.

Correctly pointing out this plan had never worked even in Japanese war games, and painfully aware of American strategic advantages in military productive capacity, Yamamoto proposed instead to seek a decision with the Americans by first reducing their forces with a preventive strike, and following it with a “Decisive Battle” fought offensively, rather than defensively. Yamamoto hoped, but probably did not believe, if the Americans could be dealt such terrific blows early in the war, they might be willing to negotiate an end to the conflict. As it turned out, however, the note officially breaking diplomatic relations with the United States was delivered late, and he correctly perceived the Americans would be resolved upon revenge and unwilling to negotiate. At the end of the attack upon Pearl Harbor, upon hearing of the mis-timing of the communiqué breaking diplomatic relations with the United States earlier that day, it is reputed Yamamoto said, “I fear all we have done today is to awaken a great, sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve.”; however, there is no documented evidence the statement was made.

The Naval General Staff proved reluctant to go along and Yamamoto was eventually driven to capitalize on his popularity in the fleet by threatening to resign to get his way. Admiral Osami Nagano and the Naval General Staff eventually caved in to this pressure, but only insofar as approving the attack on Pearl Harbor.

The First Air Fleet commenced preparations for the Pearl Harbor Raid, solving a number of technical problems along the way, including how to launch torpedoes in the shallow water of Pearl Harbor and how to craft armor-piercing bombs by machining down battleship gun projectiles.

As Yamamoto had planned, the First Air Fleet of six carriers commenced hostilities against the Americans on December 7, 1941, launching 353 aircraft against Pearl Harbor in two waves. The attack was a complete success according to the parameters of the mission which sought to sink at least four American battleships and prevent the U.S. Fleet from interfering in Japan’s southward advance for at least six months. American aircraft carriers were also considered a choice target, but these were not in port at the time of the attack.

In the end, five American battleships were sunk, three were damaged, and eleven other cruisers, destroyers and auxiliaries were sunk or seriously damaged. The Japanese lost only 29 aircraft, while 74 were damaged from anti-aircraft fire from the ground. The damaged aircraft were disproportionately dive and torpedo bombers, seriously impacting available firepower to exploit the first two waves’ success, so the commander of the First Air Fleet, Naval Lieutenant-General Chuichi Nagumo, withdrew. Yamamoto later lamented Nagumo’s failure to seize the initiative to seek out and destroy the American carriers, absent from the harbor, or further bombard various strategically important facilities on Oahu. Nagumo had absolutely no idea where the American carriers might be, and remaining on station while his forces cast about looking for them ran the risk of his own forces being found first and attacked while his aircraft were absent searching. In any case, insufficient daylight remained after recovering the aircraft from the first two waves for the carriers to launch and recover a third before dark, and Nagumo’s escorting destroyers lacked the fuel capacity for him to loiter long. Much has been made of Yamamoto’s hindsight, but (in keeping with Japanese military tradition not to criticize the commander on the spot) he did not punish Nagumo in any way for his withdrawal.

On the strategic level, the attack was a disaster for Japan, rousing American passions for revenge due to it being a “sneak attack.” The shock of the attack coming in an unexpected place, with such devastating results and without the expected “fair play” of a declaration of war galvanized the American public’s determination to avenge the attack. When asked by Prime Minister Fumimaro Konoe in mid-1941 concerning the outcome of a possible war with the United States, Yamamoto made a well-known and prophetic statement: If ordered to fight, “I shall run wild considerably for the first six months or a year, but I have utterly no confidence for the second and third years.” His prediction would be vindicated as Japan easily conquered territories and islands for the first six months of the war until it suffered a shattering defeat at the Battle of Midway on June 4–7, 1942, which ultimately tilted the balance of power in the Pacific towards the U.S.

As a strategic blow intended to prevent American interference in the Dutch East Indies for six months, the Pearl Harbor attack was a success, but unbeknownst to Yamamoto, it was a pointless one. The U.S. Navy had abandoned any intention of attempting to charge across the Pacific towards the Philippines at the outset of war in 1935 (in keeping with the evolution of War Plan Orange). In 1937, the U.S. Navy had further determined even fully manning the fleet to wartime levels could not be accomplished in less than six months, and myriad other logistic assets needed to execute a trans-Pacific movement simply did not exist and would require two years to construct after the onset of war. In 1940, U.S. Chief of Naval Operations, Admiral Harold Stark had penned a Plan Dog memorandum, which emphasized a defensive war in the Pacific while the U.S. concentrated on defeating Nazi Germany first, and consigned Admiral Husband Kimmel’s Pacific Fleet to merely keeping the Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN) out of the eastern Pacific and away from the shipping lanes to Australia. Moreover, it is in question whether the U.S. would have gone to war at all had Japan only attacked British and Dutch possessions in the Far East.

With the American Fleet largely neutralized at Pearl Harbor, Yamamoto’s Combined Fleet turned to the task of executing the larger Japanese war plan devised by the Imperial Japanese Army and Navy General Staff. The First Air Fleet proceeded to make a circuit of the Pacific, striking American, Australian, Dutch and British installations from Wake Island to Australia to Ceylon in the Indian Ocean. The 11th Air Fleet caught the American 5th Air Force on the ground in the Philippines hours after Pearl Harbor, and then proceeded to sink the British Force “Z” (battleship HMS Prince of Wales and battlecruiser HMS Repulse) underway at sea.

Under Yamamoto’s able subordinates, Naval Lieutenant-Generals Jisaburō Ozawa, Nobutake Kondō and Ibō Takahashi, the Japanese swept the inadequate remaining American, British, Dutch and Australian naval assets from the Dutch East Indies in a series of amphibious landings and surface naval battles that culminated in the Battle of the Java Sea on February 27, 1942. Along with the occupation of the Dutch East Indies came the fall of Singapore (February 15, 1942), and the eventual reduction of the remaining American-Filipino defensive positions in the Philippines on the Bataan peninsula (April 9, 1942) and Corregidor island (May 6, 1942). The Japanese had secured their oil- and rubber-rich “Southern Resources Area.”

By late March, having achieved their initial aims with surprising speed and little loss (albeit against enemies ill-prepared to resist them), the Japanese paused to consider their next moves. Yamamoto and a few Japanese military leaders and officials waited, hoping that the United States or Great Britain would negotiate for an armistice or a peace treaty to end the war in their favor. But when the British, as well as the Americans, expressed no interest in negotiating with Japan for any cease fire, the Japanese thoughts turned to securing their newly seized territory and acquiring more with an eye toward attempting to force one or more of their enemies out of the war.

Competing plans were developed at this stage, including thrusts to the west against India, the south against Australia and the east against the United States. Yamamoto was involved in this debate, supporting different plans at different times with varying degrees of enthusiasm and for varying purposes, including “horse-trading” for support of his own objectives.

Plans included ideas as ambitious as invading India or Australia, or seizing Hawaii. These grandiose ventures were inevitably set aside as the army could not spare enough troops from China for the first two (which would require a minimum of 250,000 men), nor shipping to support the latter two. (Shipping was allocated separately to IJN & IJA, and jealously guarded.) Instead, the Imperial General Staff supported an army thrust into Burma in hopes of linking up with Indian Nationalists revolting against British rule, and attacks in New Guinea and the Solomon Islands designed to imperil Australia’s sea line of communication with the United States. Yamamoto agitated for an offensive decisive battle in the east to finish off the American fleet, but the more conservative Naval General Staff officers were unwilling to risk it.

On April 18, in the midst of these debates, the Doolittle Raid struck Tokyo and the surrounding areas, galvanizing the threat posed by the American aircraft carriers in the minds of staff officers, and giving Yamamoto an event he could exploit to get his way as further debate over military strategy came to a quick end. The Naval General Staff agreed to Yamamoto’s Midway (MI) Operation, subsequent to the first phase of the operations against Australia’s link with America, and concurrent with their own plan to seize positions in the Aleutian Islands.

Yamamoto rushed planning for the Midway and Aleutians missions, while dispatching a force under Naval Major-General Takeo Takagi, including the Fifth Carrier Division (the large, new carriers Shōkaku and Zuikaku), to support the effort to seize the islands of Tulagi and Guadalcanal for seaplane and aeroplane bases, and the town of Port Moresby on Papua New Guinea’s south coast facing Australia.

The Port Moresby (MO) Operation proved an unwelcome setback. Although Tulagi and Guadalcanal were taken, the Port Moresby invasion fleet was compelled to turn back when Takagi clashed with an American carrier task force in the Battle of the Coral Sea in early May. Although the Japanese sank the American carrier USS Lexington and damaged the USS Yorktown (CV-5), the Americans damaged the carrier Shōkaku so badly that she required dockyard repairs, and the Japanese lost the light carrier Shoho. Just as importantly, Japanese operational mishaps and American fighters and anti-aircraft fire devastated the dive bomber and torpedo plane formations of both Shōkaku’s and Zuikaku’s air groups. These losses sidelined Zuikaku while she awaited replacement aircraft and aircrews, and saw to tactical integration and training. These two ships would be sorely missed a month later at Midway.

Yamamoto’s plan for Midway Island was an extension of his efforts to knock the U.S. Pacific Fleet out of action long enough for Japan to fortify her defensive perimeter in the Pacific island chains. Yamamoto felt it necessary to seek an early, offensive decisive battle.

This plan was long believed to have been to draw American attention—and possibly carrier forces—north from Pearl Harbor by sending his Fifth Fleet (two light carriers, five cruisers, 13 destroyers, and four transports) against the Aleutians, raiding Dutch Harbor on Unalaska Island and invading the more distant islands of Kiska and Attu.

While Fifth Fleet attacked the Aleutians, First Mobile Force (4 carriers, 2 battleships, 3 cruisers, and 12 destroyers) would raid Midway and destroy its air force. Once this was neutralized, Second Fleet (1 light carrier, 2 battleships, 10 cruisers, 21 destroyers, and 11 transports) would land 5,000 troops to seize the atoll from the American Marines.

The seizure of Midway was expected to draw the American carriers west into a trap where the First Mobile Force would engage and destroy them. Afterward, First Fleet (1 light carrier, 7 battleships, 3 cruisers and 13 destroyers), in conjunction with elements of Second Fleet, would mop up remaining American surface forces and complete the destruction of the Pacific Fleet.

To guard against mischance, Yamamoto initiated two security measures. The first was an aerial reconnaissance mission (Operation K) over Pearl Harbor to ascertain if the American carriers were there. The second was a picket line of submarines to detect the movement of the American carriers toward Midway in time for First Mobile Force, First Fleet, and Second Fleet to combine against it. In the event, the first was aborted and the second delayed until after American carriers had sortied.

The plan was a compromise and hastily prepared (apparently so it could be launched in time for the anniversary of Tsushima), but appeared well thought out, well organized, and finely timed when viewed from a Japanese viewpoint. Against four carriers, two light carriers, 11 battleships, 16 cruisers and 46 destroyers likely to be in the area of the main battle the Americans could field only three carriers, eight cruisers, and 15 destroyers. The disparity appeared crushing. Only in numbers of carrier decks, available aircraft, and submarines was there near parity between the two sides. Despite various frictions developed in the execution, it appeared—barring something extraordinary—Yamamoto held all the cards.

The Americans were able to learn of the Japanese plans thanks to code breaking of Japanese naval code D (known to the U.S. as JN-25). As a result, Admiral Chester Nimitz, the Pacific Fleet commander, was able to circumvent both of Yamamoto’s security measures and position his outnumbered forces in the exact position to conduct a devastating ambush. By Nimitz’s calculation, his three available carrier decks, plus Midway, gave him rough parity with Nagumo’s First Mobile Force.

Following a nuisance raid by Japanese flying boats in May, Nimitz dispatched a minesweeper to guard the intended refueling point for Operation K near French Frigate Shoals, causing the reconnaissance mission to be aborted and leaving Yamamoto ignorant of whether Pacific Fleet carriers were still at Pearl Harbor. (It remains unclear why Yamamoto permitted the earlier attack, and why his submarines did not sortie sooner, as reconnaissance was essential to the success of MI.) He also dispatched his carriers toward Midway early, and they passed the intended picket line force of submarines en route to their station, negating Yamamoto’s back-up security measure. Nimitz’s carriers positioned themselves to ambush the Kido Butai (Striking Force) when it struck Midway. A token cruiser and destroyer force was sent toward the Aleutians, but otherwise Nimitz ignored them. On June 4, 1942, days before Yamamoto expected them to interfere in the Midway operation, American carrier-based aircraft destroyed the four carriers of the Kido Butai, catching the Japanese carriers at an especially vulnerable moment.

With his air power destroyed and his forces not yet concentrated for a fleet battle, Yamamoto attempted to maneuver his remaining forces, still strong on paper, to trap the American forces. He was unable to do so because his initial dispositions had placed his surface combatants too far from Midway, and because Admiral Raymond Spruance prudently withdrew to the east in a position to further defend Midway Island, believing (based on a mistaken submarine report) the Japanese still intended to invade. Not knowing several battleships, including the powerful Yamato, were on the Japanese order of battle, he did not comprehend the severe risk of a night surface battle, in which his carriers and cruisers would be at a disadvantage. However, his move to the east did avoid the possibility of such a battle taking place. Correctly perceiving he had lost and could not bring surface forces into action, Yamamoto aborted the invasion of Midway and withdrew. The defeat marked the high tide of Japanese expansion.

Yamamoto’s plan for MI has been the subject of much criticism. Many commentators state it violated the principle of concentration of force, and was overly complex. Others point out similarly complex Allied operations (such as Operation MB8) that were successful, and note the extent to which the American intelligence coup derailed the operation before it began. Had Yamamoto’s dispositions not denied Nagumo adequate pre-attack reconnaissance assets, both the American cryptanalytic success and the unexpected appearance of Fletcher’s carriers would have been irrelevant.

The Battle of Midway solidly checked Japanese momentum, but the IJN was still a powerful force and capable of regaining the initiative. They planned to resume the thrust with Operation FS aimed at eventually taking Samoa and Fiji to cut the American life-line to Australia. This was expected to short-circuit the threat posed by General Douglas MacArthur and his American and Australian forces in New Guinea. To this end, development of the airfield on Guadalcanal continued and attracted the baleful eye of Yamamoto’s opposite number, Admiral Ernest King.

To prevent the Japanese from regaining the initiative, King ramrodded the idea of an immediate American counterattack through the Joint Chiefs of Staff. This precipitated the American invasion of Guadalcanal and beat the Japanese to the punch, with Marines landing on the island in August 1942 and starting a bitter struggle that lasted until February 1943 and commenced a battle of attrition Japan could ill afford.

Yamamoto remained in command as Commander-in-Chief, retained at least partly to avoid diminishing the morale of the Combined Fleet. However, he had lost face as a result of the Midway defeat and the Naval General Staff were disinclined to indulge in further gambles. This reduced Yamamoto to pursuing the classic defensive Decisive Battle strategy he had attempted to overturn.

The naval and land battles at Guadalcanal caught the Japanese over-extended and attempting to support fighting in New Guinea while guarding the Central Pacific and preparing to conduct Operation FS. The FS operation was abandoned and the Japanese attempted to fight in both New Guinea and Guadalcanal at the same time. Already stretched thin, they suffered repeated setbacks due to a lack of shipping, a lack of troops, and a disastrous inability to coordinate Army and Navy activities.

Yamamoto committed Combined Fleet units to a series of small attrition actions across the south and central Pacific that stung the Americans, but suffered losses he could ill afford in return. Three major efforts to carry the island precipitated a pair of carrier battles that Yamamoto commanded personally at the Eastern Solomons and Santa Cruz Islands in September and October, and finally a wild pair of surface engagements in November, all timed to coincide with Japanese Army pushes. The timing of each major battle was successively derailed when the army could not hold up its end of the operation. Yamamoto’s naval forces won a few victories and inflicted considerable losses and damage to the U.S. Fleet in several naval battles around Guadalcanal which included the battles of Savo Island, Cape Esperance, and Tassafaronga, but he could never draw the Americans into a decisive fleet action. As a result, the Japanese Navy’s strength began to bleed off.

There were severe losses of carrier dive-bomber and torpedo-bomber crews in the carrier battles, emasculating the already depleted carrier air groups. Japan could not hope to match the United States in quantities of well-trained replacement pilots, and the quality of both Japanese land-based and naval aviation began declining. Particularly harmful, however, were losses of numerous destroyers in the unsuccessful Tokyo Express supply runs. The IJN already faced a shortage of such ships, and these losses further exacerbated Japan’s already weakened commerce defense. With Guadalcanal lost in February 1943, there was no further attempt by the Japanese navy to seek a major battle in the Solomon Islands against the U.S. fleet, although smaller attrition battles continued. Yamamoto shifted the load of the air battle away from the depleted carrier air wings to land-based naval air forces.

To boost morale following the defeat at Guadalcanal, Yamamoto decided to make an inspection tour throughout the South Pacific. On April 14, 1943, the US naval intelligence effort, code-named “Magic,” intercepted and decrypted a message containing specific details regarding Yamamoto’s tour, including arrival and departure times and locations, as well as the number and types of aircraft that would transport and accompany him on the journey. Yamamoto, the itinerary revealed, would be flying from Rabaul to Balalae Airfield, on an island near Bougainville in the Solomon Islands, on the morning of April 18, 1943.

U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt ordered Secretary of the Navy Frank Knox to “Get Yamamoto.” Knox instructed Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Ernest J. King of Roosevelt’s wishes. Admiral King telephoned Admiral Chester W. Nimitz at Pearl Harbor. This mission would be Top Secret and Urgent. Admiral Nimitz consulted Admiral William F. Halsey, Jr., Commander, South Pacific, then authorized a mission on April 17 to intercept Yamamoto’s flight en route and shoot it down. A squadron of USAAF Lockheed P-38 Lightning aircraft were assigned the task as only they possessed the range to intercept and engage. Select pilots from three units were informed that they were intercepting an “important high officer” with no specific name given.

On the morning of April 18, despite urgings by local commanders to cancel the trip for fear of ambush, Yamamoto’s two Mitsubishi G4M bombers, used as fast transport aircraft without bombs, left Rabaul as scheduled for the 315 mi (507 km) trip. Sixteen Lightnings intercepted the flight over Bougainville and a dogfight ensued between them and the six escorting Mitsubishi A6M Zeroes. First Lieutenant Rex T. Barber engaged the first of the two Japanese transports which turned out to be T1-323 (Yamamoto’s aircraft). He targeted the aircraft with gunfire until it began to spew smoke from its left engine. Barber turned away to attack the other transport as Yamamoto’s plane crashed into the jungle.

The crash site and body of Yamamoto were found the next day in the jungle north of Buin, Papua New Guinea, by a Japanese search and rescue party, led by army engineer, Lieutenant Hamasuna. According to Hamasuna, Yamamoto had been thrown clear of the plane’s wreckage, his white-gloved hand grasping the hilt of his katana, still upright in his seat under a tree. Hamasuna said Yamamoto was instantly recognizable, head dipped down as if deep in thought. A post-mortem of the body disclosed that Yamamoto had received two 0.50-caliber bullet wounds, one to the back of his left shoulder and another to his left lower jaw that exited above his right eye. The Japanese navy doctor examining the body determined that the head wound killed Yamamoto. The more violent details of Yamamoto’s death were hidden from the Japanese public; the medical report was whitewashed, changed “on orders from above,” according to biographer Hiroyuki Agawa.

His staff cremated his remains at Buin, and the ashes were returned to Tokyo aboard the battleship Musashi, Yamamoto’s last flagship. Yamamoto was given a full state funeral on June 5, 1943, where he received, posthumously, the title of Marshal and was awarded the Order of the Chrysanthemum (1st Class). He was also awarded Nazi Germany’s Knight’s Cross of the Iron Cross with Oak Leaves and Swords. Part of his ashes were buried in the public Tama Cemetery, Tokyo, and the remainder at his ancestral burial grounds at the temple of Chuko-ji in Nagaoka City. He was succeeded as commander-in-chief of the Combined Fleet by Admiral Mineichi Koga.

The wreck of the aircraft that carried Yamamoto remains as a tourist attraction in the Bougainville jungle near Moila Point, a few kilometers off the Panguna-Buin road. Signposts can be found near the village of Aku, 24 km outside Buin. A path to the wreck has been cut through the jungle, an hour’s walk from the road. Other artifacts from the crash site, including the outer wing panel and the Admiral’s seat, are at the Isoroku Yamamoto Memorial Hall and Museum in Nagaoka, Niigata, Japan.

Yamamoto practiced calligraphy. He and his wife, Reiko, had four children: two sons and two daughters. Yamamoto was an avid gambler, enjoying Go, shogi, billiards, bridge, mah jong, poker, and other games that tested his wits and sharpened his mind. He frequently made jokes about moving to Monaco and starting his own casino. He enjoyed the company of geisha, and his wife Reiko revealed to the Japanese public in 1954 that Yamamoto was closer to his favorite geisha Kawai Chiyoko than to her, which stirred some controversy. After his death, his funeral procession passed by Kawai’s quarters on the way to the cemetery.

Decorations

The Breast Star of the Order of the Chrysanthemum

Grand Cordon of the Order of the Rising Sun Paulownia Blossoms

Grand Cordon of the Order of the Sacred Treasure

Order of the Golden Kite (1st class)

Order of the Golden Kite (2nd class)

Knight’s Cross of the Iron Cross with Oak Leaves and Swords

Yamamoto’s Career Promotions

Midshipman—November 14, 1904

Ensign—August 31, 1905

Sublieutenant—September 28, 1907

Lieutenant—October 11, 1909

Lieutenant Commander—December 13, 1915

Commander—December 1, 1919

Captain—December 1, 1923

Rear Admiral—November 30, 1929

Vice Admiral—November 15, 1934

Admiral—November 15, 1940

Marshal-Admiral—April 18, 1943 (posthumous)

In Popular Culture

Since the end of the Second World War, a number of Japanese and American films have depicted the character of Isoroku Yamamoto.

One of the most notable films is the 1970 movie Tora! Tora! Tora!, which stars Japanese actor Sô Yamamura as Yamamoto, who states after the attack on Pearl Harbor, "I fear that all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve", attributed to Yamamoto in Tora! Tora! Tora! (1970), in reference to the attack on Pearl Harbor. However, there is no evidence that Yamamoto said this in reality.

The first film to feature Yamamoto was Toho's 1953 film Taiheiyô no washi, (later released in the United States as Eagle of the Pacific), in which Yamamoto was portrayed by Denjirô Ôkôchi.

The 1960 film The Gallant Hours depicts the battle of wits between Vice-Admiral William Halsey, Jr. and Yamamoto from the start of the Guadalcanal Campaign in August 1942 to Yamamoto's death in April 1943. The film, however, portrays Yamamoto's death as occurring in November 1942, the day after the Naval Battle of Guadalcanal, and the P-38 aircraft that killed him as coming from Guadalcanal.

In Daiei Studios's 1969 film Aa, kaigun (later released in the United States as Gateway to Glory), Yamamoto was portrayed by Shôgo Shimada.

Professional wrestler Harold Watanabe adopted the villainous Japanese gimmick of Tojo Yamamoto in reference to both Yamamoto and Hideki Tojo

Award-winning Japanese actor Toshiro Mifune (star of The Seven Samurai) portrayed Yamamoto in three films:

Rengō Kantai Shirei Chōkan: Yamamoto Isoroku (1968, later released in Canada and the United States as Admiral Yamamoto),

Gekido no showashi 'Gunbatsu' (1970, lit. "Turning Point of Showa History: The Militarists"), and

Midway (1976, where all of the Japanese scenes had English dialogue).

A fictionalized version of Yamamoto's death was portrayed in the Baa Baa Black Sheep episode "The Hawk Flies on Sunday", though only photos of Yamamoto were shown. In this episode, set much later in the war than in real life, the Black Sheep, a Marine Corsair squadron, joins an army squadron of P-51 Mustangs. The Marines intercepted fighter cover while the army shot down Yamamoto.

In Shūe Matsubayashi's 1981 film Rengō kantai (lit. "Combined Fleet", later released in the United States as The Imperial Navy), Yamamoto was portrayed by Keiju Kobayashi.

In the 1993 OVA series Konpeki no Kantai (lit. Deep Blue Fleet), instead of dying in the plane crash, Yamamoto blacks out and suddenly wakes up as his younger self, Isoroku Takano, after the Battle of Tsushima in 1905. His memory from the original timeline intact, Yamamoto uses his knowledge of the future to help Japan become a stronger military power, eventually launching a coup d'état against Hideki Tōjō's government. In the subsequent Pacific War, Japan's technologically advanced navy decisively defeats the United States, and grants all of the former European and American colonies in Asia full independence. Later on, Yamamoto convinces Japan to join forces with the United States and Britain to defeat Nazi Germany.

In Neal Stephenson's 1999 book Cryptonomicon, Yamamoto's final moments are depicted, with him realizing that Japan's naval codes have been broken and that he must inform headquarters.

In the 2001 film Pearl Harbor, Yamamoto was portrayed by Oscar-nominated Japanese-born American actor Mako Iwamatsu. Like Tora! Tora! Tora!, this film also features a version of the sleeping giant quote.

In the 2004 anime series Zipang, Yamamoto (voiced by Bunmei Tobayama) works to develop the uneasy partnership with the crew of the JMSDF Mirai, which has been transported back sixty years through time to the year 1942.

In the Axis of Time trilogy by author John Birmingham, after a naval task force from the year 2021 is accidentally transported back through time to 1942, Yamamoto assumes a leadership role in the dramatic alteration of Japan's war strategy.

In The West Wing episode "We Killed Yamamoto", the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff uses the assassination of Yamamoto to advocate for another assassination.

In Douglas Niles' 2007 book MacArthur's War: A Novel of the Invasion of Japan (written with Michael Dobson), which focuses on General Douglas MacArthur and an alternate history of the Pacific War (following a considerably different outcome of the Battle of Midway), Yamamoto is portrayed sympathetically, with much of the action in the Japanese government seen through his eyes, though he could not change the major decisions of Japan in World War II.

In Toei's 2011 war film Rengō Kantai Shirei Chōkan: Yamamoto Isoroku (Blu-Ray titles:- English "The Admiral"; German "Der Admiral"), Yamamoto was portrayed by Kōji Yakusho. The film portrays his career from Pearl Harbor to his death in Operation Vengeance

In Robert Conroy's 2011 book Rising Sun, Yamamoto directs the IJN to launch a series of attacks on the American West Coast, in the hope the United States can be convinced to sue for peace and securing Japan's place as a world power; but cannot escape his lingering fear the war will ultimately doom Japan.

In the 2019 motion picture Midway, Yamamoto is portrayed by Etsushi Toyokawa.

Sources

Agawa, Hiroyuki; Bester, John (trans.). The Reluctant Admiral. New York: Kodansha, 1979. A definitive biography of Yamamoto in English. This book explains much of the political structure and events within Japan that led to the war.

Coetzee, Daniel; Eysturlid, Lee W. (2013). Philosophers of War: The Evolution of History's Greatest Military Thinkers [2 Volumes]: The Evolution of History's Greatest Military Thinkers. ABC-CLIO.

Davis, Donald A. Lightning Strike: The Secret Mission to Kill Admiral Yamamoto and Avenge Pearl Harbor. New York: St. Martin's Press, 2005.

Dull, Paul S. A Battle History of the Imperial Japanese Navy, 1941–1945. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press, 1978.

Evans, David C. and Mark R. Peattie. Kaigun: Strategy, Tactics, and Technology in the Imperial Japanese Navy 1887–1941. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press, 1997.

Glines, Carroll V. Attack on Yamamoto (1st edition). New York: Crown, 1990. Glines documents both the mission to shoot down Yamamoto and the subsequent controversies with thorough research, including personal interviews with all surviving participants and researchers who examined the crash site.

Lundstrom, John B. The First Team: Pacific Naval Air Combat from Pearl Harbor to Midway. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press, 1984.

Miller, Edward S. War Plan Orange: The U.S. Strategy to Defeat Japan, 1897–1945. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press, 1991.

Peattie, Mark R. Sunburst: The Rise of Japanese Naval Air Power, 1909–1941. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press, 2002.

Prados, John. Combined Fleet Decoded: The Secret History of American Intelligence and the Japanese Navy in World War II. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press, 2001.

Prange, Gordon. At Dawn We Slept. New York: Penguin Books, 1982.

Ugaki, Matome; Chihaya, Masataka (trans.). Fading Victory: The Diary of Admiral Matome Ugaki, 1941–45. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1991. Provides a high-level view of the war from the Japanese side, from the diaries of Yamamoto's Chief of Staff, Admiral Matome Ugaki. Provides evidence of the intentions of the imperial military establishment to seize Hawaii and to operate against Britain's Royal Navy in the Indian Ocean. Translated by Masataka Chihaya, this edition contains extensive clarifying notes from the U.S. editors derived from U.S. military histories.

Parillo, Mark (2006). "The United States in the Pacific". In Higham, Robin; Harris, Stephen (eds.). Why Air Forces Fail: the Anatomy of Defeat. The University Press of Kentucky.

Isoroku Yamamoto. 

 
Photo of damage to Japanese armored cruiser Nisshin after one of its guns burst during the Battle of Tsushima in May 1905. The explosion injured future Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto.

Isoroku Yamamoto, future commander-in-chief of the Combined Fleet with his lifelong friend Teikichi Hori as young officers of the Imperial Japanese Navy. Yamamoto holds the rank of Lieutenant-commander in this image. Dating it between 1915-1919.

Tomb of the Unknown Soldier, Arlington National Cemetery, Arlington, Virginia. Japanese Vice Admiral Osami Nagano lays a wreath at the tomb, circa 1927. At the right end of the Japanese delegation is the Naval Attaché to the United States, Captain Isoroku Yamamoto. The U.S. Navy officer standing hatless just behind them is Lieutenant Commander Paulus P. Powell, Aide to VAdm. Nagano during this visit.

Yamamoto in front of the United States Capitol during his postings as a naval attaché in Washington D.C., 1926-28,

Future Imperial Japanese Navy Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto (second from right in second row from front) photographed as a captain with former Eta Jima Naval Academy classmates sometime in the mid-to-late 1920s.

Isoroku Yamamoto during a visit to the Tajima Residence. Admirals Yorio Sawatomo (front row, 1st right), Mineichi Koga (front row, 2nd right) and Teikichi Hori are also pictured (front row sitting, 1st left) 5 September 1931.

In 1933 there was an exhibition event on the island of Oahu known as a gymkhana ("a multi-game equestrian event to display the training and talents of horses and their riders") which was held at Schofield Barracks. In 1933 horses (and mules) still played a major role in Army field operations—cavalry, towing artillery, recon, etc. Based upon analysis of this 1933 photo showing Imperial Japanese Naval officers visiting this event and being shown a transit device there is an IJN officer in the center of the photo who shows a remarkable resemblance to Isoroku Yamamoto.

Isoroku Yamamoto, wearing civilian clothes. Taken at the Hotel Astor in New York on 10 August 1934.

Imperial Japanese Navy (then) Rear Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto (center) after arriving in Southampton, England for the 1934 London Naval Conference. 16 October 1934.

Isoroku Yamamoto, circa 1937; note Order of the Golden Kite at collar.

Isoroku Yamamoto.

Main officers of the Combined Fleet taken on November 24, 1939. Front row, 8th from right: Admiral Yamamoto. To the right of Yamamoto, Admirals Koga, Okuma, Mikawa and others. To the left of Yamamoto: Admirals Nagumo, Ozawa, Eiji Goto, Kurita and others.

Identification of officers in above photo.

Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto inside his flagship Nagato. This photograph was taken by the Ministry of the Navy, and published on the 17 December 1941 issue of the Japanese pictorial magazine "Shashinshūho".

Commander-in-Chief of the Combined Fleet Isoroku Yamamoto and Combined Fleet Chief of Staff Matome Ugaki photographed on the bridge of the battleship Nagato, flagship of the Combined Fleet. August 1941 - February 1942.

Commander-in-Chief of the Combined Fleet Isoroku Yamamoto photographed on the bridge of the battleship Nagato, flagship of the Combined Fleet. August 1941 - February 1942.

Commander-in-Chief of the Combined Fleet Isoroku Yamamoto photographed on the bridge of the battleship Nagato, flagship of the Combined Fleet. August 1941 - February 1942.

Commander-in-Chief of the Combined Fleet Isoroku Yamamoto and Combined Fleet Chief of Staff Matome Ugaki photographed on the bridge of the battleship Nagato, flagship of the Combined Fleet. August 1941 - February 1942.

Japanese aircraft carrier Akagi. 24 December 1941.

"American citizen what can you do about this?” Office for Emergency Management. Office of War Information. Domestic Operations Branch. Bureau of Special Services. (03/09/1943 - 09/15/1945)

“Better Work to Win!” Office for Emergency Management. War Production Board. (01/1942 - 11/03/1945)

“I'll dictate the terms from the White House!* Oh yeah! - Not if we keep `em firing!” Office for Emergency Management. War Production Board. (01/1942 - 11/03/1945) *Attributed to Yamamoto but which he never stated.

Yamamoto on deck, 1942.

New Year’s day 1943. Combined Fleet Headquarters staff on board Yamato. Front row from right: Senior Chief of Staff Colonel Kuroshima, Fleet Engineer Colonel Kubota, former Fleet Engineer Rear Admiral Nakamura, Combined Fleet Commander-in-Chief Admiral Yamamoto, Chief of Staff Vice Admiral Ugaki, Fleet Surgeon General Rear Admiral Takada, and Fleet Accounting Chief Colonel Kitamura. Center row from right: Lieutenant Colonel Toibana, Air Staff Officer, and Watanabe, War Staff Officer. Lieutenant Colonel, Engine A staff Lieutenant Colonel Isobe, operations staff Colonel Fujii, communications staff Lieutenant Colonel Wada, weather chief Lieutenant Colonel Tomono, and torpedo staff Lieutenant Colonel Koike. Back row from right: Lieutenant Mashita, Accounting Officer attached to Headquarters, Captain Wada (author), Military Medical Officer attached to Headquarters, Major I, Chief of Air Staff, Major Doi, Chief of Navigation Staff, Lieutenant Colonel Fukusaki, Adjutant, Major Aoki, Chief of Engineer Staff, Captain Furuyama, Code Chief. Of these, Major General Takada, Lieutenant Colonel Kyogoku, Lieutenant Colonel Tomono, Major Muroi, and Lieutenant Colonel Fukusaki were killed in action on April 18, 1943, along with Admiral Yamamoto. Lieutenant General Ugaki and Colonel Kitamura were also wounded.

Admiral Yamamoto on the Japanese airbase of Rabaul on New Britain. Yamamoto tips his cap to a Japanese plane as it takes off.

Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto hours before his death inspecting zero fighters in Rabaul Airbase, 1943.

The last picture of Isoroku Yamamoto (1884–1943), taken shortly before his plane was shot down.

The ashes of Imperial Japanese Navy Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto are carried from the battleship Musashi at Kisarazu, Japan on 23 May 1943.

Emperor Hirohito of Japan, with officers of the Imperial Japanese Navy and high officials on board battleship Musashi off Yokosuka Naval Base, upon her return to Japan with the remains of Isoroku Yamamoto, Commander-in-Chief of the Combined Fleet, who was killed when his plane was shot down over Bougainville Island two months earlier. On the front row, left-to-right: Osami Nagano, Chief of the Imperial Japanese Navy General Staff; Kōichi Kido, Lord Keeper of the Privy Seal; HIH Nobuhito, Prince Takamatsu; HIM Emperor Shōwa (Hirohito); Tsuneo Matsudaira, Imperial Household Minister; Shigetarō Shimada, Minister of the Navy; Mineichi Koga, Commander-in-Chief of the Combined Fleet; and Saburō Hyakutake, Grand Chamberlain. 24 May 1943.

Prime Minister Hideki Tojo bows to family members of Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto after Yamamoto's body is returned to Japan, following his assassination by American aircraft in Operation Vengeance. Tokyo, Japan. May 1943.

Prime Minister Hideki Tojo bows to the funeral portrait of Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto in May 1943, after Yamamoto's body is returned to Japan following his assassination by American aircraft in Operation Vengeance. Tokyo, Japan.

State Funeral for Marshal-admiral Isoroku Yamamoto of the Imperial Japanese Navy on Saturday, 5 June 1943. Yamamoto's ashes were placed alongside Admiral Tōgō Heihachirō (hero of the Russo-Japanese war in 1904–1905) in the village cemetery at Tama, near Tokyo, facing the Imperial Palace. At the time they were the only two naval men, exclusive of Imperial princes, honored by state funerals. 5 June 1943.

Admiral Yamamoto's funeral procession in a Tokyo street. June 5, 1943.

Admiral Yamamoto's funeral procession in Hibuya Park. June 5, 1943.

Admiral Yamamoto's funeral procession in Hibuya Park. June 5, 1943.

Isoroku Yamamoto's grave, date unknown.

Grave of Isoroku Yamamoto.

Grave of Imperial Japanese Navy Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto at Tama Reien Cemetery in Fuchū, Tokyo.

Marshal Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto.

Marshal Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto.

Isoroku Yamamoto in 1905 just before going into action during the Russo-Japanese War.

Yamamoto Isoroku and Yamamoto Reiko at their wedding. Her surname before the wedding was Mihashi.

Isoroku Yamamoto (first row third from right) and Teikichi Hori (first row first from right), with friends and family, 1920s.

Captain Isoroku Yamamoto, 1920s.

Isoroku Yamamoto with his lifelong friend Teikichi Hori, 1920s-30s.

(Left to right) Capt. Yamamoto Isoroku, Japanese naval attaché in Washington, D.C., U.S. Secretary of the Navy Curtis D. Wilbur, another Japanese naval officer, and Adm. Edward W. Eberle, chief of U.S. naval operations, 17 February 1926.

Captain Yamamoto, January 30, 1928.

Imperial Japanese Navy Admiral Mitsumasa Yonai (left) with Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto (right) photographed in the late 1930s when Yonai was Navy Minister and Yamamoto was vice-minister.

Robert Craigie at a farewell party hosted by deputy minister of the Navy, Isoroku Yamamoto. 16 February 1939.

Isoroku Yamamoto as Vice-Minister of the Navy, 1 August 1939.

Imperial Japanese Navy Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto at Tokyo Station en route to take command of the Combined Fleet on August 31, 1939.

Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto, Imperial Japanese Navy Planning meeting photograph on battleship Nagato sometime in 1940, when he was Commander in Chief, Combined Fleet. Note that this is an excerpt of a larger image that shows other staff members at the meeting, including one holding the large dividers partially seen here (see next photo).

Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto, Imperial Japanese Navy Planning meeting photograph on battleship Nagato sometime in 1940, when he was Commander in Chief, Combined Fleet.

Another view of Yamamoto at the same time as the previous photo.

A World War II American propaganda poster depicting Isoroku Yamamoto with the quote - "I am looking forward to dictating peace to the United States in the White House in Washington" - attributed to him but which he never stated.

Combined Fleet Headquarters staff on board the Yamato. The sixth person from the left is Commander-in-Chief Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto, and the fifth person his Chief of Staff Vice Admiral Matome Ugaki. 10 February 1942.

Imperial Japanese Navy Combined Fleet commander Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto (left) with Admiral Jinichi Kusaka (center) at Rabaul in April 1943, shortly before Yamamoto's death.

Yamamoto shortly before his plane was shot down.

'Death of Japanese Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto'. Painting by Sergeant Vaughn A. Bass, of the 4th Air Force Historical Section, based on information provided by Lieutenant Colonel Thomas G. Lanphier, Jr. It depicts then-Captain Lanphier's P-38 Lightning fighter shooting down a Betty bomber that was carrying Admiral Yamamoto. Another P-38 is attacking one of the Zero fighters that formed the Admiral's escort. This action took place near Kahili, Bougainville, on 18 April 1943. USAF 11462 AC.

The wreck of the Mitsubishi G4M1 Model 11 bomber which was shot down over Bougainville in April 1943, killing Imperial Japanese Navy Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto.

Admiral Yamamoto's funeral procession in Hibuya Park. June 5, 1943.

Admiral Yamamoto's funeral procession in Hibuya Park. June 5, 1943.

Sleeve insignia of Kaigun Taishō (Admiral); the rank Yamamoto held at the time of his death.

Japanese attack plan at Pearl Harbor, Japan, 1941.